| Author |
Message |
Humbug
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:27 pm Post subject:
Longevity of RW |
|
|
After a bit of experimenting, I settled on DVD+RW as my ppreferred
type of disk for DVD authoring.
This is largely to do with compatibility betwen different drives; my
Sony Vaio (yes, I know ...) is extremely unwilling to read DVD+R or
DVD-R and is a bit iffy with DVD-RW :-(
I was talking to a colleague at work about it recently, and he said
that DVD+RW is not a good format for keeping stuff for a long period,
because the dye is designed such that it can change its properties
easily (so as to be e-written), and that it would naturally
deteriorate in a comparatively short space of time.
Well, he's known to be a first-class bulshitter, but it does sound a
little convincing.
Should I make DVD+R copies of my stuff?
They might outlast the Vaio anyway :-)
--
Humbug
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Wheeler
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:13 pm Post subject:
Re: Longevity of RW |
|
|
Try a Google search: Lots of stuff there.
Humbug wrote:
| Quote: | After a bit of experimenting, I settled on DVD+RW as my ppreferred
type of disk for DVD authoring.
This is largely to do with compatibility betwen different drives; my
Sony Vaio (yes, I know ...) is extremely unwilling to read DVD+R or
DVD-R and is a bit iffy with DVD-RW :-(
I was talking to a colleague at work about it recently, and he said
that DVD+RW is not a good format for keeping stuff for a long period,
because the dye is designed such that it can change its properties
easily (so as to be e-written), and that it would naturally
deteriorate in a comparatively short space of time.
Well, he's known to be a first-class bulshitter, but it does sound a
little convincing.
Should I make DVD+R copies of my stuff?
They might outlast the Vaio anyway :-)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Wheeler
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:22 pm Post subject:
Re: Longevity of RW |
|
|
Humbug wrote:
| Quote: |
I was talking to a colleague at work about it recently, and he said
that DVD+RW is not a good format for keeping stuff for a long period,
because the dye is designed such that it can change its properties
easily (so as to be e-written), and that it would naturally
deteriorate in a comparatively short space of time.
|
Interesting article here:
http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub121/sec4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Humbug
Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:36 am Post subject:
Re: Longevity of RW |
|
|
"When I make a word do a lot of work like that," said Phil Wheeler
<w6tuh-ng4@yahoo.com>, "I always pay it extra."
| Quote: | Humbug wrote:
I was talking to a colleague at work about it recently, and he said
that DVD+RW is not a good format for keeping stuff for a long period,
because the dye is designed such that it can change its properties
easily (so as to be re-written), and that it would naturally
deteriorate in a comparatively short space of time.
Interesting article here:
http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub121/sec4.html
|
Interesting, indeed.
"The alloy film is not as stable as the dye used in R discs because
the material normally degrades at a faster rate ...", which seems to
support Mark's claim.
"... however, these discs should still be stable enough to outlast the
current CD or DVD technology" - so I may not have to rush to
re-archive my stuff just yet :-)
Thanks, Phil!
--
Humbug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|