Multiplex decoder nearly rewired.
DVD-Software.info Forum Index DVD-Software.info
Your one stop source for DVD Software
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Multiplex decoder nearly rewired.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> Tubes
Author Message
Patrick Turner
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:27 am    Post subject: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

Some of you were following my progress with re-designing & rewiring
of the stereo multitplex decoder I have within an ancient
Trio receiver.

I finally settled on a design using all tubes that resembles the
method of operation of the first Quad add on MPX unit with 3 transistors

except that I have all triodes.

After the ratio detector, there is a V1 6DJ8 amp which amplifies the
signal
from the RD by about 5 times, then buffers its anode output with a
direct coupled CF, V2.
From this V2CF, a feed to a pair of parallel 19kHz tuned circuits
filters out the 19kHz and V3 triode amplifies it and
powers a tuned 19kHz tranny which has a CT secondary and two diodes
then convert the 19kHz into its full wave rectified form which is mainly
38kHz.
This signal is used to synchronize a 38kHz oscillator with 2 triodes
very like the type
Scott used but with a 6CG7, V4/5.
The oscillator is a PP type, and the double tuned 38kHz tranny
has two CT windings, pri for the anodes, sec for the connection via its
CT to the
composite signal from V2CF, minus the 19kHz pilot tone.
A ring diode demodulator almost identical to the design used by Quad is
then employed
with 4 x 27k R and 4 x 1N9148 diodes. A pair 10k R off the two diode
junction
outputs charges a pair of 900pF caps, one for each channel.
These RC values gave the right amount of de-emphasis.
The signals from each channel are then fed to a first order RC filter to

help remove switching noise, then fed to CF buffers, 12AU7, V6/7,
which drive LC and RC 3rd order filters to further remove any switching
artifacts.

The L&R signals are taken to switch contacts to select stereo or mono.

The mono signal is derived by de-emphasising the signal from the
V2CF after the 19kHz notch filter with a simple RC filter, then to a
switch.

Another pair of CF buffers, 12AU7, V8/9 are used to buffer the signals
recovered
before being allowed out of the box to a preamp or other amp.

I found that with the loudest radio station playing, I was getting
a maximumm of 8vrms of audio output voltage.

Stereo separation is determined by careful setting of the tuned circuits

and correct compensation to ensure the gains at audio and the subcarrier
signals
were identical after the CF, V2, which is loaded with the effects of the

notch filter.
I was able to get over 30dB of separation from 20Hz to 8 kHz, abive
which the
sep dropped to about 20dB by 13 kHz, good enough.
I suspect the separation drifts due to the caps I have used across the
tuning coils, and I have to buy a brace of temperature stable caps.
A few degrees of 38khz carrier phase shift relative to the subcarrier
double side band
signal can reduce sep from over 30db to 15dB, which is a lot.
The compensation is achieved by just the right sized cap across the
cathode R of the V1 amp stage, which has 22k as the anode R
and 3.9k as the cathode R, so hence its approx gain of 5.

I may switch to using 12AU7 instead of the 6DJ8, since there is
probably too much gain.

Noise was strange problem after all the bugs were ironed out.

I have an FM stereo miniature transmitter based on the BA1404 chip
running
off a 1.40 V supply, ( which is the right voltage btw ).

I think the standard emphasis circuit which I have used as per the app
schematic
manages to inject some noise, hiss, into the modulation of the supressed
carrier signa
so that when switching from stereo to mono, the hiss with stereo is a
lot greater.
There is also some hum on both stereo and mono, 100Hz, and I don't know
where that's coming from, but it is in the signal from the ratio
detector,
so it isn't from the MPX decoder. Rails are clean as can be.

If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum, which is of
concern
because its 30mV at the tuner output. Hiss remains constant in stereo.
but at least that's only a few mV.
The max AF signals are up to 8Vrms, so the SNR is barely -50dB,
or about as good as vinyl.

Ah, HUM, the Royal Pain in the Arse when you cannot
find any reason for it to exist.

I can't hear any hum in the background of other stations, but then
that's difficult
to hear with a signal going on.


But its sure sounds well compared to an Audio Reflex tuner I have which
uses all chips,
and which has a better
SNR ratio; more like about -60dB.

Later this week i will remove the SE 6BQ5 audio amps in this unit since
I never ever use
them for listening; they are not good enough for realistic levels in my
lounge.

Then i will tweak the PS further, and provide an all DC supply for
each of the 13 tubes that will be left on the chassis.
2 x 6AQ8 for the 100MHz input/oscillatormixer/ AFC stage,
2 x 6BA6 for the 10.7MHz IF,
1 x 6AU6 for the limiter,
and all the 5 tubes tubes above in the MPX unit.
Then the AM section of the tuner which runs separately
from the FM part has 6BE6, 6BA6 for mixer and IF,
then 6AU6 in triode for detector, so quite a lot of tubes all up.

Some folks say diode ring demodulators are inherently noisy.
hence the need to keep the signal level high.
But the 38khz carrier level is about 20Vrms, with a maximum
of 8Vrms of imposed modulation, surely that's a high enough sig level.
It'd have to be a lot higher than the system Quad used 44 years ago
since their 3 transistor
unit used only a 15V supply, thus limiting voltage swings to about
1/3 of what i am using.
But would the type of diodes make a difference?

Quad achieved a lot with just one transistor used for the synchronized
38khz
oscillator.
When there was no 19khz pilot tone as there sometimes isn't with a mono
transmission,
the bias voltages developed by 19khz amplification and stereo operation
ceased to
be generated so DC biased diodes were used automatically
switch from stereo to mono, so the mono signal
was taken direct from the buffered output of the ratio detector.
DC biased diodes and fets are used routinely now to switch all sorts of
things;
they are considered a sonic pest by many,
Quad was the only one to incorporate such a neat trick as feature at
that time.
Not really needed of course, but had the yanks done the same thing
they'd
have used 3 extra tubes and a lot more gear.
Quad's methods were very ingenious.

Patrick Turner.

Back to top
Patrick Turner
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

Bob wrote:

Quote:
"I have an FM stereo miniature transmitter based on the BA1404 chip
running
off a 1.40 V supply, ( which is the right voltage btw ).

There is also some hum on both stereo and mono, 100Hz, and I don't know
where that's coming from, but it is in the signal from the ratio
detector,
so it isn't from the MPX decoder. Rails are clean as can be.

If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum

Ah, HUM, the Royal Pain in the Arse when you cannot
find any reason for it to exist.

I can't hear any hum in the background of other stations, but then
that's difficult
to hear with a signal going on. "



Quote:


Maybe the hum is in the BA1404 chip circuit? Try listening to it with
another good receiver and see if the hum is present or not.

I have to establish this tonight.

The hum tends to dissapear as you tune off the station
before the noise level rises...


Quote:
Hum is a
big problem with local homebuilt AM "micro" transmitters, usually it's
the RF signal paths being switched from one path to another thru
rectifier diodes in power supplies, causing undesired amplitude
modulation as seen by a receiver.. FM should be less sensitive to
this, but it may still "leak" thru and be heard at the levels you are
talking about.

yes but when I turn off the well shielded PS in the micro mitter box
where the BA1404 is in its own steel box for shielding, the hum remains!



Quote:
FM receivers do a good job of rejecting AM, but some
still can get thru. Like the 50db down you are getting. The fact
that you still have hum after shutting the receiver's power supply down
but before the filter caps discharge, and that you can't hear it on
radio stations, would make me think it's the BA1404 chip and or
residual AM from the rectifier diodes of the BA1404 chip power supply.
Try passing that power supply's DC output wires thru a ferrite ring
with a few turns bifilar wound to block off the RF from flowing down
those wires to the power supplie's rectifier diodes. That may
eliminate the undesired AM and the hum.

I will have to do some more tests with my other tuner and
amplify its level up by 25db to match the same output levels of the tubed
tuner
to see if the noise problems are the same.

I suspect there is noise entering the BA1404 audio inputs from the series
R used for pre-emphasis, and that noise modulates the subcarrier and hence
there is more
hiss in stereo than when switched to mono, when the SNR is very good.
When listening in mono direct from the ratio detector, the subcarrier info
with the possible high noise in the L-R modulation is all shunted away by
the
de-emphasis RC filter.
The noise may not be affecting the modulation of L+R.
I cannot see how the use of the very selective 38kHz oscillator circuit
and ring diodes could create what sounds like a crook tube or the sound of
resistance noise amplified that is about 12dB above the L+R mono noise
taken direct from the ratio detector.

There is an answer, but finding it is the bother.

There are NO SNR measurements quoted in the data for the BA1404,
so i assume the makers know it was crap.

Patrick Turner.
Back to top
Patrick Turner
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

Bob wrote:

Quote:
Duh, now I see it "If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to
"run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum". For some
reason I read it to say "If i switch off the FM receiver and allow it
to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum"

My bad....

I can switch off EITHER the FM sig gene supply, or the FM receiver supply,
and both run on for seconds until the rails sag.
The hum stays the same.

Turning off/on items nearby made no difference.

Patrick Turner.
Back to top
Jon Yaeger
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

in article 1131928841.537937.234860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Bob at
wa2ise@ix.netcom.com wrote on 11/13/05 7:40 PM:

Quote:
"I have an FM stereo miniature transmitter based on the BA1404 chip
running
off a 1.40 V supply, ( which is the right voltage btw ).


There is also some hum on both stereo and mono, 100Hz, and I don't know
where that's coming from, but it is in the signal from the ratio
detector,
so it isn't from the MPX decoder. Rails are clean as can be.

If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum

Ah, HUM, the Royal Pain in the Arse when you cannot
find any reason for it to exist.

I can't hear any hum in the background of other stations, but then
that's difficult
to hear with a signal going on. "

Maybe the hum is in the BA1404 chip circuit? Try listening to it with
another good receiver and see if the hum is present or not. Hum is a
big problem with local homebuilt AM "micro" transmitters, usually it's
the RF signal paths being switched from one path to another thru
rectifier diodes in power supplies, causing undesired amplitude
modulation as seen by a receiver.. FM should be less sensitive to
this, but it may still "leak" thru and be heard at the levels you are
talking about. FM receivers do a good job of rejecting AM, but some
still can get thru. Like the 50db down you are getting. The fact
that you still have hum after shutting the receiver's power supply down
but before the filter caps discharge, and that you can't hear it on
radio stations, would make me think it's the BA1404 chip and or
residual AM from the rectifier diodes of the BA1404 chip power supply.
Try passing that power supply's DC output wires thru a ferrite ring
with a few turns bifilar wound to block off the RF from flowing down
those wires to the power supplie's rectifier diodes. That may
eliminate the undesired AM and the hum.



This isn't an "answer" and it isn't very helpful, but the BA1404 is what it
is . . . an inexpensive, mediocre solution designed to run on a single AA
cell. The circuit has a lot of deficiencies (e.g. frequency drift with
temperature).

There are a lot of considerations when using that device. Layout and
shielding are important. I'd try shielding the circuit as best as possible.

A much better candidate for the task is the ROHM FM transmitter series, the
BH14xx. These feature a PLL frequency synthesizer, lower distortion, etc.

I designed and built a portable stereo FM transmitter based upon the
manufacturer's data, which was very comprehensive. It used SMT parts, and I
needed a microscope to prototype it. LAYOUT WAS CRITICAL; I heard all kinds
of spurious crap until it was done correctly. I got a former RF engineer
from Scientific Atlanta to help me with that.

I'd be happy to forward the schematic to anyone interested. I built it and
it does work . . .

Much
Back to top
Patrick Turner
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

Jon Yaeger wrote:

Quote:
in article 1131928841.537937.234860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Bob at
wa2ise@ix.netcom.com wrote on 11/13/05 7:40 PM:

"I have an FM stereo miniature transmitter based on the BA1404 chip
running
off a 1.40 V supply, ( which is the right voltage btw ).


There is also some hum on both stereo and mono, 100Hz, and I don't know
where that's coming from, but it is in the signal from the ratio
detector,
so it isn't from the MPX decoder. Rails are clean as can be.

If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum

Ah, HUM, the Royal Pain in the Arse when you cannot
find any reason for it to exist.

I can't hear any hum in the background of other stations, but then
that's difficult
to hear with a signal going on. "

Maybe the hum is in the BA1404 chip circuit? Try listening to it with
another good receiver and see if the hum is present or not. Hum is a
big problem with local homebuilt AM "micro" transmitters, usually it's
the RF signal paths being switched from one path to another thru
rectifier diodes in power supplies, causing undesired amplitude
modulation as seen by a receiver.. FM should be less sensitive to
this, but it may still "leak" thru and be heard at the levels you are
talking about. FM receivers do a good job of rejecting AM, but some
still can get thru. Like the 50db down you are getting. The fact
that you still have hum after shutting the receiver's power supply down
but before the filter caps discharge, and that you can't hear it on
radio stations, would make me think it's the BA1404 chip and or
residual AM from the rectifier diodes of the BA1404 chip power supply.
Try passing that power supply's DC output wires thru a ferrite ring
with a few turns bifilar wound to block off the RF from flowing down
those wires to the power supplie's rectifier diodes. That may
eliminate the undesired AM and the hum.


This isn't an "answer" and it isn't very helpful, but the BA1404 is what it
is . . . an inexpensive, mediocre solution designed to run on a single AA
cell. The circuit has a lot of deficiencies (e.g. frequency drift with
temperature).

Yes, I am aware of its deficiencies, but today when i carefully compared the
recieved
signal of my new decoder and a fairly noise free Audio Reflex tuner using chips,

I concluded the AR is only 8dB better.
The AR makes 0.15Vrms output with a certain level of modulation on one channel,
and the decoder of mine makes 2.3Vrms, so when i amplified the AR signal
up to match the tube version, then removed the modulation on the test signal,
it was then I found the AR was quieter. I could live with the tube decoder,
but I am a perfectionist, and like low noise if its possible.

Quote:


There are a lot of considerations when using that device. Layout and
shielding are important. I'd try shielding the circuit as best as possible.

It seems to be OK; the BA1404 is on a board with an RF buffer amp on its output
with filtering for harmonics, and is in a steel metal box. The box is inside a
slightly larger box
which has two modulation oscillators which give 5 different F for each channel.


Quote:

A much better candidate for the task is the ROHM FM transmitter series, the
BH14xx. These feature a PLL frequency synthesizer, lower distortion, etc.

I designed and built a portable stereo FM transmitter based upon the
manufacturer's data, which was very comprehensive. It used SMT parts, and I
needed a microscope to prototype it. LAYOUT WAS CRITICAL; I heard all kinds
of spurious crap until it was done correctly. I got a former RF engineer
from Scientific Atlanta to help me with that.

But for basic set up and channel sep adjustment, the BA1404 will do.

At the end of the day if better signals come from the broadcast stations then i
should hear it better
once the basic technical set up of the receiver has been established properly.


Quote:


I'd be happy to forward the schematic to anyone interested. I built it and
it does work . . .

Much

I followed a link from this site to extract the information below,
http://members.tripod.com/~transmitters/index.htm

Patrick Turner.

The copied notes re various chips....


20th Oct '99
My look at the NJM2035 Stereo Multiplexer chip by New Japan Radio
( To be read in conjunction with my "Stereo for Dummies" page )

The Rohm BA1404 tried to do too much on one chip, what with a Stereo
Multiplexer, Pilot Generation Circuitry, RF Oscillator and RF Buffer all on
board.

On top of that, Rohm's Spec Sheets did not show the basic filters on the input,
pilot and MPX that we all know are totally necessary. Low-end Kit manufacturers
did not bother to do a bit of basic design homework themselves. They decided to
do away with such "niceties" and just rake in the money. Most BA1404 kits are
exactly a copy of the Rohm application note with maybe an extra RF stage for
little more power.

BA1404 kits started a rash of FAQ's, newsletters, FTP sites. They all
concentrated on how to increase power or make it a bit more frequency-stable.
Nobody decided to get to the root of the Audio problems - Add the filters.
Wavemach came close by using only the Stereo Generator of the BA1404, adding a
Compressor/Limiter to prevent clipping/aliasing and ignoring the RF parts of the
BA1404.

New Japan Radio's NJM2035 (Specs PDF here) seems to be the nearest contender to
the market addressed by the BA1404. But even though the BA1404 is not being
produced any more for a long time, Low-end Kit manufacturers did not start
making a NJM2035 kit. I think the reason is obvious : The NJM2035 Spec Sheet
does not have a suggested PCB while the BA1404 one did ;)

OK, that's enough venom for a day. Let's get technical again.

Can I just unplug my BA1404 and put in a NJM2035 ??????

No, you cannot. The NJM2035 does not have an RF Oscillator and RF Buffer stage.
Maybe that is wise as now you have no chance of leakage of the MPX signal to the
RF and vice versa. That was one of the internal design flaws of the BA1404.

Is the NJM2035 any good ?????

The NJM2035 is just a Stereo Multiplexor chip using TDM chopping at 38KHz. It
does not use oversampling techniques.

The NJM2035's basic electronics seem to give a channel separation of about 35-40
dB, out of which the suggested MPX filter makes you loose about 5-10 dB in the
3-10 KHz range. Pro equipment would aim at 55dB separation.

The NJM2035's distortion figures are about 0.4% -0.6% in the modulation range
you will want to use it. Pro equipment would aim for distortion much below 0.1%

The PDF claims Signal to Noise figures of around 67 dB. That's quite fair
indeed.

The NJM2035 is made by a respectable company with many other high end Audio
processing chips like DNR, Surround Sound, Digital Equalisers.

So all in all, quite a nice chip for the low end. It will definitely outperform
the BA1404 and might even sound similar to the cheaper 38 KHz TDM switching kits
out there ( But for 20% the cost).

Of course, you should not even remotely consider it for serious broadcasting. It
is a toy, but a much better toy than the BA1404 and maybe some of the other
simpler kits out there. I would say as a rule of thumb, If all you can afford is
1-7W of RF Power, the rest of your Audio equipment would be such that the
NJM2035 would be ideal.

Mods

Don't know if I should call them Mods, as there are no NJM2035 kits out there to
begin with. Anyway, here are some engineering notes -

A) The PDF uses hard to obtain values for the MPX filter. Using SPICE, it's a
matter of minutes to redesign the MPX filter to original specifications, using
more easily available parts. ( A little tad better actually, but what's 0.1 dB
amongst friends)

The Goals are that the new filter should remove harmonics centered around 114
KHz ( Third harmonic of 38 KHz) atleast as good as existing circuit. Also, the
phase shift should be lower/same as existing circuit.

B) The original PDF shows a pre-emphasis stage with very slight roll-off of the
pre-emphasis curve at the high end. We would have loved the pre-emphasis to stop
emphasising signals above 15 KHz. Infact, it would be nice if there was a
brickwall that stopped signals after 15 KHz altogether. It is also nice to notch
out the Audio signals around 19KHz as they interfere with the Pilot Tone and
create beats.
Back to top
Bob
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

Duh, now I see it "If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to
"run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum". For some
reason I read it to say "If i switch off the FM receiver and allow it
to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum"

My bad....
Back to top
Bob
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: Multiplex decoder nearly rewired. Reply with quote

"I have an FM stereo miniature transmitter based on the BA1404 chip
running
off a 1.40 V supply, ( which is the right voltage btw ).


There is also some hum on both stereo and mono, 100Hz, and I don't know
where that's coming from, but it is in the signal from the ratio
detector,
so it isn't from the MPX decoder. Rails are clean as can be.

If i switch off the FM signal gene and allow it to "run on" from the
store of energy
in the caps in its PS then there is no cessation of the hum

Ah, HUM, the Royal Pain in the Arse when you cannot
find any reason for it to exist.

I can't hear any hum in the background of other stations, but then
that's difficult
to hear with a signal going on. "

Maybe the hum is in the BA1404 chip circuit? Try listening to it with
another good receiver and see if the hum is present or not. Hum is a
big problem with local homebuilt AM "micro" transmitters, usually it's
the RF signal paths being switched from one path to another thru
rectifier diodes in power supplies, causing undesired amplitude
modulation as seen by a receiver.. FM should be less sensitive to
this, but it may still "leak" thru and be heard at the levels you are
talking about. FM receivers do a good job of rejecting AM, but some
still can get thru. Like the 50db down you are getting. The fact
that you still have hum after shutting the receiver's power supply down
but before the filter caps discharge, and that you can't hear it on
radio stations, would make me think it's the BA1404 chip and or
residual AM from the rectifier diodes of the BA1404 chip power supply.
Try passing that power supply's DC output wires thru a ferrite ring
with a few turns bifilar wound to block off the RF from flowing down
those wires to the power supplie's rectifier diodes. That may
eliminate the undesired AM and the hum.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> Tubes All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Office Forum Access Forum Windows Server Exchange Server

Powered by phpBB