| Author |
Message |
Cynicor
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Warren
Guest
|
 Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:41 am Post subject:
Re: Verrazano-Narrows bridge |
|
|
Cynicor wrote:
I like the first one. Not a rat in sight.
--
Mike Warren
My web gallery: http://web.aanet.com.au/miwa/mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shawn Hirn
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:41 am Post subject:
Re: Verrazano-Narrows bridge |
|
|
In article
<4376b68e$0$23370$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-03.brisbane.pipenetworks.c
om.au>,
"Mike Warren" <miwa-not-this-bit@or-this-csas.net.au> wrote:
I agree. I have some great photos of that bridge in daylight from a
small plane, but they are on 35mm prints. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brian Stirling
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:40 am Post subject:
Re: Verrazano-Narrows bridge |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:46:04 -0500, "Kinon O'cann"
<Yes.it's.me.Bowser> wrote:
| Quote: | I believe you, but that is the stupidest God-damn thing I've ever heard of.
I find it hard to imagine that anyone in any field of security could dupe
themselves into believing that preventing people from taking pictures *from*
a bridge can somehow prevent an attack by terrorists. If they are, then we
(the USA) have employed the biggest pack of morons on the planet in our
security and intelligence industry.
|
They will stop you or follow you if you carry professional gear but if
you use a P&S they ignore you. Do you suppose the bad guys don't know
this? Do you suppose they would use a Canon 1D Mark II or would they
use a P&S?
They are spending so much time and money on things that don't improve
security that we are less secure because of it!
Mind you, I fully expect the bad guys to be using cameras, mostly
digital, to scout locations and nothing the security folks have been
doing will stop that. We need a different approach to the protection
of high valued assets...
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in