| Author |
Message |
Mike Henley
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bart van der Wolf
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:41 am Post subject:
Re: Anyone here using imageMagick? |
|
|
"a" <alfred_molonREMOVE@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1dcfe0624590a8ea98ad9d@news.supernews.com...
SNIP
| Quote: | I use the Windows version, controlled by PHP scripts to
generate the images and thumbnails for my site.
|
Yes, down-sampling is implemented as it should, with proper
pre-filtering/anti-aliasing:
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~bvdwolf/main/foto/down_sample/down_sample.htm>
This is an example of how it works out on a real life image (a
filmscan, so the graininess masks some of the issues that show with a
digicam).
Bart |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bart van der Wolf
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:40 am Post subject:
Re: Anyone here using imageMagick? |
|
|
"Bill Tuthill" <can@spam.co> wrote in message
news:43679809@news.meer.net...
OOPS, you're right. Thanks for the correction.
| Quote: | Thanks for all your pioneering research in this important area,
Bart. Thumbnail quality is absolutely critical for my website, and
you have helped me make progress in that area.
|
Thank you for the kind words. It has always struck me as odd that
usually more emphasis is given to image magnification, when the vast
and increasing majority of images needs to be down-sampled. It was the
lack of available references that forced me to explore the topic
myself. Sharing my findings was a minor step.
Bart |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in