Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7
DVD-Software.info Forum Index DVD-Software.info
Your one stop source for DVD Software
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> Tubes
Author Message
Guest






Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:52 pm    Post subject: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

Someday I'd like to ascend the learning curve and create my own models,
but for now I must rely on the kindness of others.

Can anyone here point me to good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7? I
have some simple models I found on a couple of websites, but have found
the performance of these models somewhat removed from reality
(especially when approaching overload conditions). On the other hand, I
know there are participants on this newsgroup who have created some
superb models for other triodes, which I have used and found quite
accurate.

Thanks in advance for your help.

--Dave

Back to top
Simon
Guest





Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:00 am    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

Hi,

Did you try the models of Andrei Frolovs? (mentioned om this site):

http://home.netcom.com/~wb2jia/tubes/spice3.txt

They are available in different models, and very accurate. I don't know
where to find a good 12BH7 model, but that is ( I guess) because I didn't
need one yet.

Hope this helps.

Simon van de Laak


<electronic_dave@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:1130093525.013745.263900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Someday I'd like to ascend the learning curve and create my own models,
but for now I must rely on the kindness of others.

Can anyone here point me to good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7? I
have some simple models I found on a couple of websites, but have found
the performance of these models somewhat removed from reality
(especially when approaching overload conditions). On the other hand, I
know there are participants on this newsgroup who have created some
superb models for other triodes, which I have used and found quite
accurate.

Thanks in advance for your help.

--Dave
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

Thanks. I did try those, but they won't work in Circuitmaker. Outside
of adding "X" to the device name, I don't know how to alter them to
make them work for me.

Simon wrote:
Quote:
Hi,

Did you try the models of Andrei Frolovs? (mentioned om this site):

http://home.netcom.com/~wb2jia/tubes/spice3.txt

They are available in different models, and very accurate. I don't know
where to find a good 12BH7 model, but that is ( I guess) because I didn't
need one yet.

Hope this helps.

Simon van de Laak


electronic_dave@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:1130093525.013745.263900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Someday I'd like to ascend the learning curve and create my own models,
but for now I must rely on the kindness of others.

Can anyone here point me to good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7? I
have some simple models I found on a couple of websites, but have found
the performance of these models somewhat removed from reality
(especially when approaching overload conditions). On the other hand, I
know there are participants on this newsgroup who have created some
superb models for other triodes, which I have used and found quite
accurate.

Thanks in advance for your help.

--Dave
Back to top
Robert McLean
Guest





Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

<electronic_dave@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130093525.013745.263900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Someday I'd like to ascend the learning curve and create my own models,
but for now I must rely on the kindness of others.

Can anyone here point me to good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7? I
have some simple models I found on a couple of websites, but have found
the performance of these models somewhat removed from reality
(especially when approaching overload conditions). On the other hand, I
know there are participants on this newsgroup who have created some
superb models for other triodes, which I have used and found quite
accurate.

Thanks in advance for your help.

--Dave


Try theses for 6SN7 and 12BH7. I dont have one for 6SL7.

*model for one half of 6SN7
*
* heater not included
* parameters based on measured values of tube sn001 section 123
* parameters revised 11 July 2005
..SUBCKT 6SN7 A G K
+ PARAMS: EX=1.42198367350321 MU=21.8420442667181 KG1=1590.64806609493
KP=132.08574792184 KVB=3.74001833403116
+ Go=-0.597874973201724 KG=8.41036640630718E-06 AG=0.420304999360986
BG=0.355371943715956
+ CCG=2.2P CGP=4.0P CCP=0.7P
E1 4 0
VALUE={V(A,K)/KP*LN(1+EXP(KP*(1/MU+(V(G,K)-Go)/SQRT(KVB+V(A,K)*V(A,K)))))}
G1 A K VALUE={ (PWR(V(4),EX)+PWRS(V(4), EX))/(KG1) }
RCP A K 1G
G2 G K VALUE =
{IF(V(G,K)>0,{Kg}*((({Ag}+V(A,K))/({Bg}+V(A,K)))**4)*V(G,K)**1.5,0)}
C1 G K {CCG} ; CATHODE GRID
C2 G A {CGP} ; GRID-PLATE
C3 A K {CCP} ; CATHODE-PLATE

..ENDS 6SN7




* model triode 12BH7 *
* heater not included
* parameters based on values from actual tube sn001, measured 25 June 2005
..SUBCKT 12BH7 A G K
+ PARAMS: EX=1.48223054785181 MU=22.522567847687 KG1=995.714361188371
KP=77.5229158440023 KVB=104.666637159648
+ Go=-0.836752888547946 KG=2.24862182207334E-07 AG=6505.28230714881
BG=638.003346507087
+ CCG=3.2P CGP=2.6P CCP=4.5P
E1 4 0
VALUE={V(A,K)/KP*LN(1+EXP(KP*(1/MU+(V(G,K)-Go)/SQRT(KVB+V(A,K)*V(A,K)))))}
G1 A K VALUE={ (PWR(V(4),EX)+PWRS(V(4), EX))/(KG1) }
RCP A K 1G
G2 G K VALUE =
{IF(V(G,K)>0,{Kg}*((({Ag}+V(A,K))/({Bg}+V(A,K)))**4)*V(G,K)**1.5,0)}
C1 G K {CCG} ; CATHODE GRID
C2 G A {CGP} ; GRID-PLATE
C3 A K {CCP} ; CATHODE-PLATE
..ENDS 12BH7
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:39 am    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

Hmmm... Circuitmaker doesn't like those either. It keeps returning
syntax errors. The format does appear quite different from that of the
models I have that DO work. Are these 3F4? I wish I knew what to look
for.
Back to top
Simon
Guest





Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:47 am    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

Hi,

Did you change the "m" seen on constants to "e-3", "k" to "e3" or
"exp" to "2.7182818^". The first two changes did work for me (circuitmaker
2000)

With kind regards,

Simon van de Laak

<electronic_dave@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:1130159233.790706.319210@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Thanks. I did try those, but they won't work in Circuitmaker. Outside
of adding "X" to the device name, I don't know how to alter them to
make them work for me.

Simon wrote:
Hi,

Did you try the models of Andrei Frolovs? (mentioned om this site):

http://home.netcom.com/~wb2jia/tubes/spice3.txt

They are available in different models, and very accurate. I don't know
where to find a good 12BH7 model, but that is ( I guess) because I
didn't
need one yet.

Hope this helps.

Simon van de Laak


electronic_dave@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:1130093525.013745.263900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Someday I'd like to ascend the learning curve and create my own
models,
but for now I must rely on the kindness of others.

Can anyone here point me to good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7?
I
have some simple models I found on a couple of websites, but have
found
the performance of these models somewhat removed from reality
(especially when approaching overload conditions). On the other hand,
I
know there are participants on this newsgroup who have created some
superb models for other triodes, which I have used and found quite
accurate.

Thanks in advance for your help.

--Dave

Back to top
Simon
Guest





Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:55 am    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

for example:

Bg G K I=(0.2079346639m)*uramp(V(G,K))^1.5 *
(((14.97041148)+V(P,K))/((9.844374217)+V(P,K)))^4

should be:

Bg G K I=(0.2079346639e-3)*uramp(V(G,K))^1.5 *
(((14.97041148)+V(P,K))/((9.844374217)+V(P,K)))^4

in circuitmaker.

Hope this helpes,

Simon van de Laak

"Simon" <tubepowerel84nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:435d4859$0$769$3a628fcd@reader10.nntp.hccnet.nl...
Quote:
Hi,

Did you change the "m" seen on constants to "e-3", "k" to "e3" or
"exp" to "2.7182818^". The first two changes did work for me
(circuitmaker
2000)

With kind regards,

Simon van de Laak

electronic_dave@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:1130159233.790706.319210@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Thanks. I did try those, but they won't work in Circuitmaker. Outside
of adding "X" to the device name, I don't know how to alter them to
make them work for me.

Simon wrote:
Hi,

Did you try the models of Andrei Frolovs? (mentioned om this site):

http://home.netcom.com/~wb2jia/tubes/spice3.txt

They are available in different models, and very accurate. I don't
know
where to find a good 12BH7 model, but that is ( I guess) because I
didn't
need one yet.

Hope this helps.

Simon van de Laak


electronic_dave@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:1130093525.013745.263900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Someday I'd like to ascend the learning curve and create my own
models,
but for now I must rely on the kindness of others.

Can anyone here point me to good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and
12BH7?
I
have some simple models I found on a couple of websites, but have
found
the performance of these models somewhat removed from reality
(especially when approaching overload conditions). On the other
hand,
I
know there are participants on this newsgroup who have created some
superb models for other triodes, which I have used and found quite
accurate.

Thanks in advance for your help.

--Dave



Back to top
Robert McLean
Guest





Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 6:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Good 3F4 models for 6SL7, 6SN7 and 12BH7 Reply with quote

oops .... I may have given you PSPICE versions. The spice programs I
currently use, LTSpice and MicroCap, handle both versions so I have gotten
lazy about checking for 3F4 vs PSpice. As for "what to look for" here is a
list of some conversion hints. There are some other things having to do
with curly brackets, { }, I forget which version seems to need them.

PSpice 3F4
Limit(X, 0, 1e6) URamp(X)
or (X + Abs(x))/2

Pwrs(x,y) x^y (as long as x >= 0)
Pwr(x,y) x^y

Ex N1 N2 Value = Bx N1 N2 V=
Gx N1 N2 Value = Bx N1 N2 I =

If( a<b, a, b) (Abs(a-b) - (a+b))/(-2)
If( a>b, a, b) (Abs(a-b) + (a+b))/2




<electronic_dave@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130182765.972533.92400@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Hmmm... Circuitmaker doesn't like those either. It keeps returning
syntax errors. The format does appear quite different from that of the
models I have that DO work. Are these 3F4? I wish I knew what to look
for.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> Tubes All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Office Forum Access Forum Windows Server Exchange Server

Powered by phpBB