Amp burn-in?
DVD-Software.info Forum Index DVD-Software.info
Your one stop source for DVD Software
 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Amp burn-in?
Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> Audio Technology
Author Message
hoarse with no name
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:42 am    Post subject: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days is
usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in exist
and is it more necessary on certain models?

Back to top
Richard Crowley
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:52 am    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"hoarse with no name" wrote ...
Quote:
If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber?

Even Dumber.

Quote:
Or is there a sensible explanation involving capacitors and such?

No. If they didn't bother to even power up the amplifier to see
if it works before shipping it to you, don't buy it.
Back to top
Barry Mann
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:44 am    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

In <no-C198E6.17104321102005@cnews.newsguy.com>, on 10/21/05
at 05:10 PM, hoarse with no name <no@spam.com> said:

Quote:
If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days
is usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in
exist and is it more necessary on certain models?

Some amplifiers require time to stabilize as they warm up to operating
temperature, but this happens at each use. This shouldn't be more than
a few minutes. Tuners are much more temperature sensitive than
amplifiers and even the cheap, very poor units don't drift
significantly as they warm up.

30 days!! How does the design engineer get anything done? Must he wait
30 days after every improvement before he can evaluate it? How can they
test the units at the factory?

I'll give very old units some slack if they haven't been used in ages
and the capacitors need to be reformed, but one could argue that the
capacitors should be replaced, not reformed.

-----------------------------------------------------------
spam: uce@ftc.gov
wordgame:123(abc):<14 9 20 5 2 9 18 4 at 22 15 9 3 5 14 5 20 dot 3 15
13> (Barry Mann)
[sorry about the puzzle, spammers are ruining my mailbox]
-----------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
Cyrus
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

In article <no-C198E6.17104321102005@cnews.newsguy.com>,
hoarse with no name <no@spam.com> wrote:

Quote:
If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days is
usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in exist
and is it more necessary on certain models?

Proper power amps have been 'broken in' before shipment.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*
Back to top
Cyrus
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:58 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

In article <Tkp6f.3364$D13.559@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>,
"Mark D. Zacharias" <spammenot@nonsense.net> wrote:

Quote:
"Barry Mann" <zzzz@zzzz.zzz> wrote in message
news:4359d781$1$avgroveq$mr2ice@wcnews.cyberonic.com...
In <no-C198E6.17104321102005@cnews.newsguy.com>, on 10/21/05
at 05:10 PM, hoarse with no name <no@spam.com> said:

If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days
is usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in
exist and is it more necessary on certain models?


Our ears (brains, actually) become more accustomed to the sound of any
component over the course of days, weeks, etc. I would say this is a much,
much larger factor than any supposed amplifier "burn-in".

Mark Z.



Acclimation of new audio components is rarely even considered. Most
won't admit when they themselves have been 'burned in'.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*
Back to top
Mark D. Zacharias
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"Barry Mann" <zzzz@zzzz.zzz> wrote in message
news:4359d781$1$avgroveq$mr2ice@wcnews.cyberonic.com...
Quote:
In <no-C198E6.17104321102005@cnews.newsguy.com>, on 10/21/05
at 05:10 PM, hoarse with no name <no@spam.com> said:

If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days
is usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in
exist and is it more necessary on certain models?


Our ears (brains, actually) become more accustomed to the sound of any
component over the course of days, weeks, etc. I would say this is a much,
much larger factor than any supposed amplifier "burn-in".

Mark Z.
Back to top
Per Stromgren
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:44:42 -0400, zzzz@zzzz.zzz (Barry Mann) wrote:

Quote:

30 days!! How does the design engineer get anything done? Must he wait
30 days after every improvement before he can evaluate it? How can they
test the units at the factory?

LOL! That was a good one. I will remember that, next time this comes
up.

Per.
Back to top
JohnR66
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"hoarse with no name" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:no-C198E6.17104321102005@cnews.newsguy.com...
Quote:

If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days is
usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in exist
and is it more necessary on certain models?

No, it is called amp burnout. If you take it out of the box. plug it in, and
it smokes, it has burned out. Back it up and take it back. : )
John
Back to top
Geoff@work
Guest





Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:41 am    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"Mark D. Zacharias" <spammenot@nonsense.net> wrote in message
news:Tkp6f.3364
Quote:
Our ears (brains, actually) become more accustomed to the sound of any
component over the course of days, weeks, etc. I would say this is a much,
much larger factor than any supposed amplifier "burn-in".

Moving your head more than a few inches will have far more effect than any
amount of amp 'burn-in'. Don't worry about it.

geoff
Back to top
Mark D. Zacharias
Guest





Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"Geoff@work" <gwood@nospam-audioproducts.co.nz> wrote in message
news:dZC7f.2588$S24.181047@news.xtra.co.nz...
Quote:


< snip>

Moving your head more than a few inches will have far more effect than any
Quote:
amount of amp 'burn-in'.


This is also true.

mz
Back to top
Arny Krueger
Guest





Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"Mark D. Zacharias" <spammenot@nonsense.net> wrote in
message news:E0K7f.9255$Zv5.2977@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net
Quote:
"Geoff@work" <gwood@nospam-audioproducts.co.nz> wrote in
message news:dZC7f.2588$S24.181047@news.xtra.co.nz...


snip

Moving your head more than a few inches will have far
more effect than any
amount of amp 'burn-in'.


This is also true.

This is one of those things that raisses a lot of
uncomfortable questions. We've got all these *golden ears*
that claim they reliably *hear* differences between wire
with 99.99% pure copper and 99.99999% pure copper, and yet
none of them ever seem to report the far larger changes that
happen when you move your head a few inches.
Back to top
Mr.T
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:42 am    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:PMSdnUl2GdoF5cLeRVn-rA@comcast.com...
Quote:
Moving your head more than a few inches will have far
more effect than any
amount of amp 'burn-in'.


This is also true.

This is one of those things that raisses a lot of
uncomfortable questions. We've got all these *golden ears*
that claim they reliably *hear* differences between wire
with 99.99% pure copper and 99.99999% pure copper, and yet
none of them ever seem to report the far larger changes that
happen when you move your head a few inches.

How do you know it is not the latter effect they are confusing for the
first? After all, when they claim to hear changes, maybe they do. Since they
can't prove why they hear the change, or consistently show which is which,
simply moving their head is probably a good explanation for their certainty
that they did indeed hear a change.

MrT.
Back to top
Mark D
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:42 am    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

Well one thing I will say about anything audio-electrical when you first
get it-purchase it.

Play the living shit out of it around the clock for 30 days, don't baby
it. If something is bound to go wrong, it usually will during this
period. Mark
Back to top
Arny Krueger
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:51 am    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:43605676$0$4806$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au
Quote:
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:PMSdnUl2GdoF5cLeRVn-rA@comcast.com...
Moving your head more than a few inches will have far
more effect than any
amount of amp 'burn-in'.


This is also true.

This is one of those things that raisses a lot of
uncomfortable questions. We've got all these *golden
ears* that claim they reliably *hear* differences
between wire with 99.99% pure copper and 99.99999% pure
copper, and yet none of them ever seem to report the far
larger changes that happen when you move your head a few
inches.

How do you know it is not the latter effect they are
confusing for the first?

I don't.

Quote:
After all, when they claim to
hear changes, maybe they do.

You figured that out, too?

Same argument applies to their hatred for level matching and
time synching, not to mention their hatred for listening for
short periods of time and switching. They are all good ways
to make things actually sound different for reasons that are
irrelevant to inherent differences in equipment sound
quality.

Quote:
Since they can't prove why
they hear the change, or consistently show which is
which, simply moving their head is probably a good
explanation for their certainty that they did indeed hear
a change.

Somehting like that! ;-)
Back to top
Choong Keat Yian
Guest





Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Amp burn-in? Reply with quote

Hi, loudspeaker burn in is smart,especially for the loudspeaker designer
before the system is designed, amp burn in is dumb as the more the amp
is in operation, to more the logic of deteriotaion of the electrolytics
in the circuitry is increasing the ESR of the capacitors., and this ESR
Equalent Series Resistance is making the amp sound more distorted in the
long run.

Choong


hoarse with no name wrote:
Quote:
If speaker break-in is dumb, is amp burn-in dumber? Or is there a
sensible explanation involving capacitors and such? I won't name the
brand, but I was reading customer reviews of a certain well regarded
model and most of the owners said that it took 30 days for this amp to
finish burning in and then it sounded great after that point. 30 days is
usually how long you get to return an item. So, does amp burn-in exist
and is it more necessary on certain models?
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> Audio Technology All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Office Forum Access Forum Exchange Server

Powered by phpBB