| Author |
Message |
Robert Morein
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:43 am Post subject:
Re: Indecision |
|
|
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1W%0f.47$Bj5.43@fe08.phx...
| Quote: |
"paul packer" <packer@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:4344827e.2123019@news.iprimus.com.au...
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:04:25 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
artsackman@comcast.net> wrote:
I can't decide whether you are a bore or a boor.
And why does that conundrum raise its ugly head in your fevered brain,
Art?
If you get excited by Bruce's self indulgent
ramblings, so be it.
I get excited by anything that isn't the same pointless bickering to
no end. But in fact I found Bruce refreshingly honest. I admit some of
his language was a bit intemperate in our "all men are created equal"
society, but hey, he's finding his way, moving into a new sphere of
life. How about cutting him a bit of slack. After all, he could be
sinking into drug addiction and alcoholism, or just decided to embrace
Satanic heavy metal. Isn't this better? :-)
I just have no respect for anyone
that equates parading around the house in
a Hugh Hefner pajama set as being a "Bohemian".
True, but think of what a makeover would do for Mikey. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clyde Slick
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:43 am Post subject:
Re: The making of a modern Bohemian |
|
|
"Robert Morein" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:iMednUIRZZimBtneRVn-tg@giganews.com...
| Quote: | .
You probably subscribe to existentialism. According to this doctrine, a
man
is not fully made until he's dead.
|
Thank God my progress is so slow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Morein
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:08 am Post subject:
Re: The making of a modern Bohemian |
|
|
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:my11f.52$Bj5.18@fe08.phx...
| Quote: |
"Robert Morein" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:iMednUIRZZimBtneRVn-tg@giganews.com...
.
You probably subscribe to existentialism. According to this doctrine, a
man
is not fully made until he's dead.
Thank God my progress is so slow.
Yes, I'm procrastinating as well. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andre Jute
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Now I have my own fartcatcher! |
|
|
Ruud Broens wrote:
| Quote: | "Andre Jute" <fiultra@yahoo.com> wrote 3 times in a message
news:1128547719.290769.193090@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
: I see now that you and George have sorted the kid. I coulda saved my
: breath. Thanks Don, George. -- Andre Jute
He, Dre, You've got a hairy mouse, too ?
R.
|
Nope. Apple Wireless Mouse.
Okay, Ruud, in the interest of street cred, I'll bite. What is "a
hairy mouse"? I hope it isn't another slimy Yaeger-trail.
Andre Jute |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andre Jute
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:11 pm Post subject:
Re: Now I have my own fartcatcher! |
|
|
Fartcatcher defines a useless jerk on a newsgroup who contributes
nothng but follows around a more useful member of the internet
community to make a useless comment on every post from the useful
member.
Leave your disgusting sex-work off the net, Yaeger. Take your crooked
garage trading away to wherever Vince the Nodding Dog went when I ran
him out.
Andre Jute
Jon Yaeger wrote:
| Quote: | in article 1128528070.107893.119160@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com, Andre Jute
at fiultra@yahoo.com wrote on 10/5/05 12:01 PM:
I have my own fartcatcher. It has been years since I last contributed
to a thread without the crooked garage trader and Atlanta rent-boy Jon
Yaeger, also known to the Atland PD as John and Jono, chiming in with
some irrelevant attack.
[snipped, Yaeger's description of his disgusting work] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Signal
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paul packer
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:43 am Post subject:
Re: Now I have my own fartcatcher! |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 22:15:11 -0400, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:
| Quote: |
paul packer said:
Not by anybody with a little bit of class.
That's a bit of a low blow, George.
Are you drumming me out of the Snobs' League?
|
Just reminding you of your duty to uphold goodness and niceness on
this NG. :-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paul packer
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:43 am Post subject:
Re: The making of a modern Bohemian |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:16:18 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
<artsackman@comcast.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Robert Morein" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:iMednUIRZZimBtneRVn-tg@giganews.com...
.
You probably subscribe to existentialism. According to this doctrine, a
man
is not fully made until he's dead.
Thank God my progress is so slow.
|
You noticed that too, Art? :-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paul packer
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:43 am Post subject:
Re: Indecision |
|
|
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:25:00 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
<artsackman@comcast.net> wrote:
| Quote: | I get excited by anything that isn't the same pointless bickering to
no end. But in fact I found Bruce refreshingly honest. I admit some of
his language was a bit intemperate in our "all men are created equal"
society, but hey, he's finding his way, moving into a new sphere of
life. How about cutting him a bit of slack. After all, he could be
sinking into drug addiction and alcoholism, or just decided to embrace
Satanic heavy metal. Isn't this better? :-)
I just have no respect for anyone
that equates parading around the house in
a Hugh Hefner pajama set as being a "Bohemian".
|
You've been looking in the window? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clyde Slick
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:43 am Post subject:
Re: The making of a modern Bohemian |
|
|
"paul packer" <packer@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:4345cf6d.2977326@news.iprimus.com.au...
| Quote: | On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:16:18 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
artsackman@comcast.net> wrote:
"Robert Morein" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:iMednUIRZZimBtneRVn-tg@giganews.com...
.
You probably subscribe to existentialism. According to this doctrine, a
man
is not fully made until he's dead.
Thank God my progress is so slow.
You noticed that too, Art? :-)
|
Not yet, maybe tomorrow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|