| Author |
Message |
Patrick Turner
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:54 pm Post subject:
2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
I finally have hooked up the stereo amp which uses 2A3
to my speakers which are about 90dB sensitivity.
I find I could listen all day and night to this underpowered
amplifier.
Whatever its doing it is doing it RIGHT.
The conditions are as follows.
Power tranny is Hammond type 370FX, and with
a 240V: 2 x 2.5V filament tranny.
Hammond 10H choke used with a quad of Sonic Frontier
PS caps of 1,100 uF each, so that with seriesed caps
I have 550uF, 10H, 550uF, as the CLC to supply power to the
pair of amp channels.
Rectifiers are IN5408 SS diodes. I don't strictly believe in tube
rectifiers;
I like them, I even use them sometimes; I just don't think they are
indispensible.
But in this case the use of a tube rectifier would have reduced the
available B+
and forced me to use fixed bias, which I don't like for any SE amps.
No need to dual mono power supplies.
180uF used to further filter the input and driver stages.
Output tubes are 2A3, RCA, NOS?, maybe used, not sure.
Ea = +270V, Ia = 57mA, cathode bias with 820ohms
bypassed with good quality 100V x 470uF.
heaters are AC 2.5V with a pot for hum nulling.
OPT is a 2.5k : 4/8/16 Hammond 25 watt rated SET gapped OPT
type 1627SE.
OPT is set up to match 2.5k to 4ohms, but I find 5 ohms is the most
correct load.
At 4Watts I get excellent open loop BW with this OPT
and freedom from saturation, of which there is only a slight trace at
about
7 Hz.
The OPT has queer resonances above 30kHz, makinf the use of
global NFB difficult for ppl with no clue about how to overcome such
connundrums.
It must be due to primary being wound close to the secondary,
and the absence of enough interleavings of windings, and the absence of
sufficient
insulation thickness.
Nevertheless, the 1627SE did turn out to be very usable, and sound is
glorious.
Driver tube is an ancient Radiotron 'made in australia' 6SN7,
used but OK. 1k Rk bypassed with 470uF, RL = 34k, 0.47 uF Wima coupling
cap,
150k grid bias R for 2A3, 1.8k series grid stopper.
The 6SN7 is operating fairly linearly and comfortably.
Without Ck bypass, the driver thd reduces, but then overall thd rises
a lot since less even order Dn cancelation takes place.
The fully bypassed Rk on the 6SN7 gives lowish Ra of about 5k for the
paralleled tube
and is thus a sufficiently low enough drive resistance to enhance the
micro detail behaviour of the
2A3, ( very necessary imho to get the best out of not just a triode
output tube,
but ALL output tubes.)
The input tube is 1/2 a 12AU7 of unknown lineage; it measured nicely,
and I like the 12AU7 for inputs; its warm, accurate, and sounds
glorious.
Its Rk is 1.8k, and also bypassed with 470uF, and taken then to 100 ohms
for
the global NFB to be applied.
RL is 50k, 0.47uF to a network for LF gain stepping, 1M+0.033uF
plus 220k, typical in many of my amps to vastly
improve the bass stability when the 12dB of global FB is applied.
The FB resistor divider network is 750 ohms to 100 ohms
with a phase tweaker bypass cap across the 750 ohms = 1,000 pF.
There is a 470pF plus 2.7k zobel network connected from the
driver grid to 0V to control the HF gain and ultimate phase shift of the
12AU7 to 6SN7 interface.
A further 5.6ohms+0.47uF Zobel network is across the OPT secondary,
and finally I got the amp to be fairly ring free when connected to
any value of cap without a pure R load, and when using a square wave.
Open loop BW with all compensation zobels in place was 20Hz to 20kHz,
-3dB,
and with 12 dB of FB the full power BW is 5Hz to 55kHz, 5 ohms.
It remains the same at lower levels of power.
A 5 kHz square wave is a bit ragged due to the mentioned OPT design
simplicity,
but the sine wave response between 30Hz and 20hHz right up to clipping
is dead flat.
A 50k Alps Black pot is used for the gain control.
Input sensitivity with 12dB applied global NFB is 0.7Vrms.
The amp's use with an CD player is fine.
Just no need for any preamp.
The sound is that of a far more powerful amplifier,
with tremendous sense of rightness, instrument detail, warmth without
muddle, not the slightest hint of any lack of bass, the usual beautiful
mids, and detailed top end.
The amp measures well at less than 1% thd at 4 watts into 5 ohms,
mainly all 2H.
But at normal levels of a watt the 3H and other H are present below the
2H
which can be seen on the CRO when monitoring the THD at all levels.
Ro is 0.47 ohm, and although my speakers vary between
4 and 20ohms, the sound appears firm, well timbred, and there isn't any
hint
of the sound being that from an inadequate amplifier.
I played Handel's water music, the sound track of 'The Pianist' for my
tests plus
a not so wonderful Naxos CD, 'The Best of Bach'.
Who says SET amps suck?
Certainly not I!.
Methinks that if the owner wanted more power, he could simply swap the
2A3 for a KT90 since the PT has a 6.3V heater winding, and then
remove the series R I have placed in the B+ lines to trim the B+
to where I want it, and with 270V, and with the UL tap on the
OPT that is provided, maybe 9+ watts of SEUL would be available.
The now unused 1670 OPT UL tap is at 40%.
But it could be at 60%, if you use the plate winding reversed,
thus further drifting a tetrode towards triode, but still not
suffering a huge loss of power due to grid current limitations.
300B could also be used, and with slightly more Ia,
but with the same low Ea, thus suiting moderate power and good matching
to
low value loads, which is a major failing in many SET amps;
they try to match so max power is at 8ohms, but that is
nearly always wrong with modern speakers, and
max power should occur at 3 or 4 ohms.
Patrick Turner.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sander deWaal
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 02, 2005 10:56 pm Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Patrick Turner <info@turneraudio.com.au> said:
| Quote: | The sound is that of a far more powerful amplifier,
with tremendous sense of rightness, instrument detail, warmth without
muddle, not the slightest hint of any lack of bass, the usual beautiful
mids, and detailed top end.
|
See, I told ya so.
Now put 2 of them in push/pull and enjoy them even more :-)
--
"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret Ludwig
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:09 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
In passively-crossed-over, or worse, single driver systems, I have
never heard a SE tube amp that sounded better than a probperly designed
and built push pull one. I can't categorically deny the possibility of
their existence, but I have heard a LOT of homebrew SET amps and their
full range performance has been universally mediocre at best.
I will concede that given a OPT specifically designed for the job a
SET might work well for a tweeter amp in a bi-amped (true bi-amped,
actively crossed-over-NOT musketeered!) setup. Such a OPT doesnt exist
and despite lip service from several known suppliers (besides the known
sociopath from Philly, who is not credible on any level anywhere) no
such part exists. They admit (substantially) all their customers are
electro-ignoramuses who can BARELY build a SET, let alone any more
sophisticated amplifier, and are running full range because it's simple
and gives 'the rolled-off "antique radio tone" they love'-i.e. the
antithesis of high fidelity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret Ludwig
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:19 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Bret Ludwig wrote
<snip>
| Quote: |
I will concede that given a OPT specifically designed for the job a
SET might work well for a tweeter amp in a bi-amped (true bi-amped,
actively crossed-over-NOT musketeered!) setup. Such a OPT doesnt exist
and despite lip service from several known suppliers (besides the known
sociopath from Philly, who is not credible on any level anywhere) no
such part exists.
|
Oops.
I meant to say "they have no desire to make one", or, "no such _desire
or intent to make any_ such part exists". Because despite the talk, the
walk is they are barely smart enough to build a crystal radio. Their
construction skills are below what 12-year-old boys demonstrated from
the 1930s to the 1960's.
(Fortunately, a depression seems imminent, which should give them
plenty of time to study and practice.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret Ludwig
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:45 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Mostly the home constructors, the xfmr winders build what they can
sell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Harriss
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:45 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Bret Ludwig wrote:
| Quote: | Bret Ludwig wrote
snip
I will concede that given a OPT specifically designed for the job a
SET might work well for a tweeter amp in a bi-amped (true bi-amped,
actively crossed-over-NOT musketeered!) setup. Such a OPT doesnt exist
and despite lip service from several known suppliers (besides the known
sociopath from Philly, who is not credible on any level anywhere) no
such part exists.
Oops.
I meant to say "they have no desire to make one", or, "no such _desire
or intent to make any_ such part exists". Because despite the talk, the
walk is they are barely smart enough to build a crystal radio. Their
construction skills are below what 12-year-old boys demonstrated from
the 1930s to the 1960's.
(Fortunately, a depression seems imminent, which should give them
plenty of time to study and practice.)
|
So who are you deliberately insulting here Bret?, the home constructors
or the transformer winders?. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Turner
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:46 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Sander deWaal wrote:
| Quote: | Patrick Turner <info@turneraudio.com.au> said:
The sound is that of a far more powerful amplifier,
with tremendous sense of rightness, instrument detail, warmth without
muddle, not the slightest hint of any lack of bass, the usual beautiful
mids, and detailed top end.
See, I told ya so.
Now put 2 of them in push/pull and enjoy them even more :-)
|
The owner wants the 2A3amps to power some JBL bullet horns from 6kHz and
up.
Kinda bein' easy on the amps, eh.
And now he's got a pair of Tannoy 15" Gold Monitors,
corner boxes, as well as the horns.
I think his horns sound better.
Patrick Turner.
| Quote: |
--
"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Turner
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:57 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Bret Ludwig wrote:
| Quote: | In passively-crossed-over, or worse, single driver systems, I have
never heard a SE tube amp that sounded better than a probperly designed
and built push pull one. I can't categorically deny the possibility of
their existence, but I have heard a LOT of homebrew SET amps and their
full range performance has been universally mediocre at best.
|
Ah well, maby you have not heard the best of what SE amplifiers can
provide.
I used to think all horns shouted or honked, until I heard a system that
was well set up.
| Quote: |
I will concede that given a OPT specifically designed for the job a
SET might work well for a tweeter amp in a bi-amped (true bi-amped,
actively crossed-over-NOT musketeered!) setup. Such a OPT doesnt exist
and despite lip service from several known suppliers (besides the known
sociopath from Philly, who is not credible on any level anywhere) no
such part exists.
|
I think the SE OPT from Hammond is quite ok for full range.
With a properly damped and set up amp the F response of the finished
2A3 was 5Hz to 55kHz at full power.
There is no reason why an amp designed for full range and with an OPT
suitable for bass won't also have a good to end.
I have routinely wound OPTs capable of 10Hz to 300kHz
at full power.
Its just a matter of turns, interleaving, and the insulation,
and about 50 calculations.
But even the simplest and cheapest OPT available off the shelf such as a
1670SE
from Hammond manages to give good enough bandwidth even without loop FB.
| Quote: | They admit (substantially) all their customers are
electro-ignoramuses who can BARELY build a SET, let alone any more
sophisticated amplifier, and are running full range because it's simple
and gives 'the rolled-off "antique radio tone" they love'-i.e. the
antithesis of high fidelity.
|
Well none of the ppl I know have systems with restricted bandwidth.
That old dumpy "valve sound" simply *is not* what they like.
All the ppl I know are fanatics about the sound quality of their systems.
Some can't solder, and can't understand Ohm's Law, but they
are *NOT* ignoramuses.
Patrick Turner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karl
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:36 pm Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Bret Ludwig wrote:
| Quote: | Mostly the home constructors, the xfmr winders build what they can
sell.
|
Lots of winders will make whatever you want. You can spec *anything*
with some of them. Like the Rutles said: All you need is cash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret Ludwig
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:02 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
| Quote: | Lots of winders will make whatever you want. You can spec *anything*
with some of them. Like the Rutles said: All you need is cash. |
If you will buy enough of them that is somewhat true. I had one place
that does a lot of secure sonar work offer to make me some MC240
outputs-but they wanted a quantity 1000 order. I replied that I dodn't
think they had ever made 1000 of anything in the last 40 years.
Their reply? "We haven't. But you aren't going to call us up five
years from now and demand one more at a 5X rush charge, and the Navy
will. For you, it's a thousand or none". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Accessory Section 8
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2005 4:44 am Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Bret Ludwig wrote:
| Quote: | Lots of winders will make whatever you want. You can spec *anything*
with some of them. Like the Rutles said: All you need is cash.
If you will buy enough of them that is somewhat true. I had one place
that does a lot of secure sonar work offer to make me some MC240
outputs-but they wanted a quantity 1000 order. I replied that I dodn't
think they had ever made 1000 of anything in the last 40 years.
Their reply? "We haven't. But you aren't going to call us up five
years from now and demand one more at a 5X rush charge, and the Navy
will. For you, it's a thousand or none".
|
This is called "contractor spoilage". Any small to medium business
doing enough business with Uncle Sugar gets that way, and when Uncle
cuts them off, the bloated management fires everyone and goes home
having made all the money they wanted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Turner
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2005 12:44 pm Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Accessory Section 8 wrote:
| Quote: | Bret Ludwig wrote:
Lots of winders will make whatever you want. You can spec *anything*
with some of them. Like the Rutles said: All you need is cash.
If you will buy enough of them that is somewhat true. I had one place
that does a lot of secure sonar work offer to make me some MC240
outputs-but they wanted a quantity 1000 order. I replied that I dodn't
think they had ever made 1000 of anything in the last 40 years.
Their reply? "We haven't. But you aren't going to call us up five
years from now and demand one more at a 5X rush charge, and the Navy
will. For you, it's a thousand or none".
This is called "contractor spoilage". Any small to medium business
doing enough business with Uncle Sugar gets that way, and when Uncle
cuts them off, the bloated management fires everyone and goes home
having made all the money they wanted.
|
The US ppl want to watch out that their govt does not sell everything off to
private
enterprise.
I saw a film recently called 'The Take' about the factory workers in
Argentina
who recently have ex-appropriated many factories after the ruination caused
by
Menen when he was in charge.
Its a different situation to the US, but there is ovewhelming global
pressure
for all businesses which make anything for anyone to just give up and leave
it to the chinese.
Anyway in Argentina the workers stole the closed down factories ( to keep
making the same good old tractors,
clothing, and ceramic tiles et all. )
Its amazing how productivity and profitability rises once you sack the
fukkin bosses
and the middle men and stop paying shareholders, none of whom know what a
day's real work is.
One reason private enterprize goes phut is the crippling
payments to the bosses for their BMW and their big lifestyles.
I don't know of any transformer winders in Argentina though....
Patrick Turner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Evans
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:24 pm Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
I'm building a PP 2a3 amp right now and haven't decided on the input
stage. I'd like to use 6J5G and/or 1626 valves. Open to other
suggestions, but like to keep to octal or UX5 types (I also have 76,
37, 56, 27). I'd also need a differential first stage for the option of
balanced or SE, and I have CCSs. 2a3 needs about -50v of bias. Ideas?
ANdy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Turner
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2005 6:56 pm Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
Andy Evans wrote:
| Quote: | I'm building a PP 2a3 amp right now and haven't decided on the input
stage. I'd like to use 6J5G and/or 1626 valves. Open to other
suggestions, but like to keep to octal or UX5 types (I also have 76,
37, 56, 27). I'd also need a differential first stage for the option of
balanced or SE, and I have CCSs. 2a3 needs about -50v of bias. Ideas?
ANdy
|
There must be 100 different ways to drive a pair of 2A3 in PP.
You will need around 37Vrms applied to each grid so the drive amp
should have ability for 70Vrms if possible.
To do that with an LTP using a pair of 6J5 is OK, and the input
stage/driver amp
that is shown at the 50/50 amp details below could be used.
http://www.turneraudio.com.au/htmlwebpgs02/schema5050ulabinteg.htm
I used 6CG7 = 6SN7 = 2 x 6J5.
Some folks would buy a decent IST and simply use a 6V6 or EL34 in triode
to drive the primary
and use the 1:2 step up to drive the 2A3 grids directly, with each 1/2
secondary
taken to separate low R value bias pots.
But if its mainly class A then cathode biasing is OK, and the IDST sec set
up as a
grounded CT winding.
With RL = 4k a-a, and a sec load of 4 ohms, and with Ea = 350V, Ia = 40mA,
PO = nearly 20 watts AB with a few watts of class A.
With 8ka-a to 8 ohms, PO = 15 watts, nearly all class A.
Rout will be about 2 ohms including tranny winding losses
and without global NFB.
Patrick Turner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sander deWaal
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2005 7:05 pm Post subject:
Re: 2A3 - Really a beautiful power tube! |
|
|
"Andy Evans" <performanceandmedia@gmail.com> said:
| Quote: | I'm building a PP 2a3 amp right now and haven't decided on the input
stage. I'd like to use 6J5G and/or 1626 valves. Open to other
suggestions, but like to keep to octal or UX5 types (I also have 76,
37, 56, 27). I'd also need a differential first stage for the option of
balanced or SE, and I have CCSs. 2a3 needs about -50v of bias. Ideas?
ANdy
|
In my 2A3 PPamp, I use a 6SN7 as input amplifier/cathodyne, followed
by a 6SN7 driver in common cathode.
Supply voltage for the driver and PI stages is ca. 350V, derived from
a separate winding on the transformer.
The output stage gets about 300V with a 5 k Raa transformer.
Atthe output, I get about 13 watts @ 1 %, mostly third order
(obviously!).
This is without GNFB, I added about 6 dB of that, which makes the
distortion about 0.5 %.
I know, I could at least skip one stage and get rid of 1 or 2 coupling
caps, but this sounds very good to me already.
Maybe in a future upgrade I'll use a LTP with CCS in the cathode path.
--
"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|