| Author |
Message |
generalpf@gmail.com
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Mar 29, 2005 7:04 pm Post subject:
Re: More apparent M$ spyware |
|
|
He was *not* asking a question. Re-read the OP, pushing all the B.S.
aside.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
generalpf@gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:10 pm Post subject:
Re: More apparent M$ spyware |
|
|
That's exactly what he's saying. He's blaming a surrogate process for
doing what the requesting application is doing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
generalpf@gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:54 pm Post subject:
Re: More apparent M$ spyware |
|
|
Don't try to use logic with these people. If Microsoft is involved,
it's their fault, even when it isn't (according to them). Also, Linux
will solve all your problems. If it doesn't, you have the wrong
problems, and should get on with fixing that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Michael Pelletier
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:43 am Post subject:
Re: More apparent M$ spyware |
|
|
generalpf@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | Don't try to use logic with these people. If Microsoft is involved,
it's their fault, even when it isn't (according to them). Also, Linux
will solve all your problems. If it doesn't, you have the wrong
problems, and should get on with fixing that.
|
Why are you guys sooo sensitive? The OP made a statement that was not
ripping Microsoft. He made a statement about a RunDLL...
Chill the hell out. Start your day of with decaf...
--
"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make really crappy operating systems." -
Linus Torvald |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erik Funkenbusch
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:50 am Post subject:
Re: More apparent M$ spyware |
|
|
On 28 Mar 2005 08:36:25 -0800, Yef wrote:
| Quote: | Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
As usual, your "shoot first and ask questions later" approach is
wrong.
Your response is comical, because it does not in any way
refute my assertion that a program tried to access the Internet
or that it arises out of XP service pack 2.
|
It does not "arise[s] out of XP service pack 2". XP only provides the tool
for some other application to run. It would be like claiming that Firefox
accesses www.abevigoda.com simply because the Abe Vigoda plugin was
installed. No, Firefox doesn't, the program (extension) that Firefox is
running is.
| Quote: | As you yourself said,
you should not shoot first and ask questions later, but this is
what you have done, because you have not refuted the substance
of my argument, but you have only nitpickingly accused me of making
an error, which is childish of you. May I ask how old you are?
|
I've not nitpicked anything. *NOTHING* in what you posted indicated there
was MS spyware, as your message title indicated. It was enitrely third
party programs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tony Gartshore
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject:
Re: More apparent M$ spyware |
|
|
In article <Pdi2e.25868$AN1.11708@fed1read03>, mjpelletier@mjpelletier.com says...
| Quote: | generalpf@gmail.com wrote:
Don't try to use logic with these people. If Microsoft is involved,
it's their fault, even when it isn't (according to them). Also, Linux
will solve all your problems. If it doesn't, you have the wrong
problems, and should get on with fixing that.
Why are you guys sooo sensitive? The OP made a statement that was not
ripping Microsoft. He made a statement about a RunDLL...
|
Err, did you read the title?
| Quote: | Chill the hell out. Start your day of with decaf...
T. |
--
Please Tony, NO!! You'd look dreadful in a basque and fishnets.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in