BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HD
DVD-Software.info Forum Index DVD-Software.info
Your one stop source for DVD Software
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HD

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> TV Technology
Author Message
HireMe.geek.nz
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:56 am    Post subject: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HD Reply with quote

BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HDTV?

Back to top
manitou910
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

HireMe.geek.nz wrote:

Quote:
BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HDTV?

CBC now has a cable sports channel in HDTV.

I don't frankly envision Newsworld going HiDef any time soon since the
greater part of their programing originates in standard def.

I'd expect the same re BBC World.

Plus, with news networks relying heavily on standards conversions
between 50hz and 60hz, even HDTV will look pretty crappy.









C.
Back to top
Stephen Neal
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:06 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

manitou910 wrote:
Quote:
HireMe.geek.nz wrote:

BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HDTV?

CBC now has a cable sports channel in HDTV.

I don't frankly envision Newsworld going HiDef any time soon since the
greater part of their programing originates in standard def.

I'd expect the same re BBC World.

Yep - BBC World News is produced in 16:9 SDTV studios (as are all BBC News
shows made by the BBC in London) The Beeb have no HDTV studios at all yet -
not even for general production. I would suspect that BBC World, being a
global channel, will be one of the BBC services least likely to move to
HDTV - especially as it is funded by advertising, hotel subscription (I
think) and sponsorship - and not a huge commercial cash generator for the
BBC. I suspect that the BBC's domestic services, aimed at and paid for by
the UK viewers via the licence fee, are likely to go HD first. The Beeb
have said that they aim for most production to be HD by 2010 - but whether
this includes non-domestic operations (BBC World, BBC America, BBC Prime,
BBC Food etc.) who knows.

Interestingly the domestic commercial channels the BBC operates in
association with Flextech (UKTV - UKTV Style, UKTV People, UKTV Food, UKTV
Drama etc.) are all still decidedly 4:3 - even though almost all of their
modern output (repeats of recent BBC productions) is originated in 16:9.
Very tedious for the many viewers in the UK with 16:9 TVs and digital
receivers capable of receiving 16:9 FHA broadcasts (Most of the domestic
production,plus quite a few imports, on the main 5 networks in the UK, plus
some of the Sky Pay TV services is in 16:9 FHA SDTV) - but we are stuck with
14:9 letterbox in a 4:3 frame for most UKTV stuff.

Quote:

Plus, with news networks relying heavily on standards conversions
between 50hz and 60hz, even HDTV will look pretty crappy.


Yep - and also DSNG links used for newsgathering and exchange are all pretty
low bit rate MPEG2 at SD level. The costs for distributing in HD would be
much higher.

The Beeb - who are the only 16:9 news operation of any size I believe -
still shoot significant amounts of 4:3 material overseas. 16:9 reports and
lives DO appear from places like Baghdad, Pakistan and even parts of Africa,
however the reports are often more "featurey" - relying entirely on BBC-shot
footage (often edited back in London). In cases where reports use pooled
material, stuff shot by broadcasters (like ABC) who work with the BBC, or
lots of local agency footage, it is still common for most stuff to be 4:3
originated, converted to 16:9 via a 14:9 pillarbox system. The Beeb are
pretty universally 4:3 in the US though - only a, now closed, LA operation
ran 525/60 16:9 for an entertainment news programme.

Steve
Back to top
manitou910
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:43 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

Stephen Neal wrote:
Quote:

BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HDTV?

CBC now has a cable sports channel in HDTV.

I don't frankly envision Newsworld going HiDef any time soon since the
greater part of their programing originates in standard def.

I'd expect the same re BBC World.

Yep - BBC World News is produced in 16:9 SDTV studios (as are all BBC News
shows made by the BBC in London) The Beeb have no HDTV studios at all yet -
not even for general production. I would suspect that BBC World, being a
global channel, will be one of the BBC services least likely to move to
HDTV - especially as it is funded by advertising, hotel subscription (I
think) and sponsorship - and not a huge commercial cash generator for the
BBC. I suspect that the BBC's domestic services, aimed at and paid for by
the UK viewers via the licence fee, are likely to go HD first. The Beeb
have said that they aim for most production to be HD by 2010 - but whether
this includes non-domestic operations (BBC World, BBC America, BBC Prime,
BBC Food etc.) who knows.

By then it likely will be all widescreen, but it's not likely to look
very good. At present it's seen in 14x9 letterbox in Canada from cable
and satellite providers.

In terms of content, however, BBC World tends to be very
Euro/Asia-centric. It's coverage of US news is, to say the least, basic
and it's coverage of Canada is almost non-existent. I flew to Italy
last June 28 which was the day of Canada's federal election (I voted in
the advance poll). On the 29th there was absolutely _nothing_ on BBC
World re the election. I had to contact the Canadian Consulate to learn
the results.

Quote:
Interestingly the domestic commercial channels the BBC operates in
association with Flextech (UKTV - UKTV Style, UKTV People, UKTV Food, UKTV
Drama etc.) are all still decidedly 4:3 - even though almost all of their
modern output (repeats of recent BBC productions) is originated in 16:9.
Very tedious for the many viewers in the UK with 16:9 TVs and digital
receivers capable of receiving 16:9 FHA broadcasts (Most of the domestic
production,plus quite a few imports, on the main 5 networks in the UK, plus
some of the Sky Pay TV services is in 16:9 FHA SDTV) - but we are stuck with
14:9 letterbox in a 4:3 frame for most UKTV stuff.

Also, I'm aware that when "Frasier" switched to widescreen HDTV for its
final two seasons, it was shown in the UK only in the 4x3 aspect ratio.

Quote:
Plus, with news networks relying heavily on standards conversions
between 50hz and 60hz, even HDTV will look pretty crappy.

Yep - and also DSNG links used for newsgathering and exchange are all pretty
low bit rate MPEG2 at SD level. The costs for distributing in HD would be
much higher.

Because so much of it is done on-the-fly, the video quality of most ENG
tends to be pretty wretched. Leaves me wondering why the networks
bother using those pricey industrial cameras when most of the stuff
looks like it was shot with a cheap VHS consumer cam.

Quote:
The Beeb - who are the only 16:9 news operation of any size I believe -
still shoot significant amounts of 4:3 material overseas. 16:9 reports and
lives DO appear from places like Baghdad, Pakistan and even parts of Africa,
however the reports are often more "featurey" - relying entirely on BBC-shot
footage (often edited back in London). In cases where reports use pooled
material, stuff shot by broadcasters (like ABC) who work with the BBC, or
lots of local agency footage, it is still common for most stuff to be 4:3
originated, converted to 16:9 via a 14:9 pillarbox system. The Beeb are
pretty universally 4:3 in the US though - only a, now closed, LA operation
ran 525/60 16:9 for an entertainment news programme.

In Canada, UK programs tend to be 14x9 letterbox.






C.
Back to top
Jeff Rife
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:49 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

Stephen Neal (stephen.neal@nospam.please.as-directed.com) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
Quote:
Very tedious for the many viewers in the UK with 16:9 TVs and digital
receivers capable of receiving 16:9 FHA broadcasts (Most of the domestic
production,plus quite a few imports, on the main 5 networks in the UK, plus
some of the Sky Pay TV services is in 16:9 FHA SDTV) - but we are stuck with
14:9 letterbox in a 4:3 frame for most UKTV stuff.

That's starting to be a problem with the shows as they filter over to BBA
America. I don't know of a TV in the US that has a zoom for 14:9, so we
either chop off the extra or just watch with bars on all sides.

--
Jeff Rife | "She just dropped by to remind me that my life
SPAM bait: | is an endless purgatory, interrupted by profound
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov | moments of misery."
spam@ftc.gov | -- Richard Karinsky, "Caroline in the City"
Back to top
Stephen Neal
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:21 am    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

"Jeff Rife" <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1beadefe8ae059e39898b1@news.nabs.net...
Quote:
Stephen Neal (stephen.neal@nospam.please.as-directed.com) wrote in
alt.video.digital-tv:
Very tedious for the many viewers in the UK with 16:9 TVs and digital
receivers capable of receiving 16:9 FHA broadcasts (Most of the domestic
production,plus quite a few imports, on the main 5 networks in the UK,
plus
some of the Sky Pay TV services is in 16:9 FHA SDTV) - but we are stuck
with
14:9 letterbox in a 4:3 frame for most UKTV stuff.

That's starting to be a problem with the shows as they filter over to BBA
America. I don't know of a TV in the US that has a zoom for 14:9, so we
either chop off the extra or just watch with bars on all sides.

Interesting - both Philips and Sony sets sold in the UK often offer both
16:9 and 14:9 zoom modes for 16:9 and 14:9 letterboxed material
respectively. 14:9 is at least a bit sharper when zoomed than 16:9 - though
neither a patch on 16:9 FHA stuff viewed natively.

Steve
Back to top
Stephen Neal
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:34 am    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

"manitou910" <manitou910@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:1uGdnSdSnpmwZR3cRVn-hQ@rogers.com...
Quote:
Stephen Neal wrote:

BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go to HDTV?

CBC now has a cable sports channel in HDTV.

I don't frankly envision Newsworld going HiDef any time soon since the
greater part of their programing originates in standard def.

I'd expect the same re BBC World.

Yep - BBC World News is produced in 16:9 SDTV studios (as are all BBC
News shows made by the BBC in London) The Beeb have no HDTV studios at
all yet - not even for general production. I would suspect that BBC
World, being a global channel, will be one of the BBC services least
likely to move to HDTV - especially as it is funded by advertising, hotel
subscription (I think) and sponsorship - and not a huge commercial cash
generator for the BBC. I suspect that the BBC's domestic services, aimed
at and paid for by the UK viewers via the licence fee, are likely to go
HD first. The Beeb have said that they aim for most production to be HD
by 2010 - but whether this includes non-domestic operations (BBC World,
BBC America, BBC Prime, BBC Food etc.) who knows.

By then it likely will be all widescreen, but it's not likely to look very
good. At present it's seen in 14x9 letterbox in Canada from cable and
satellite providers.

I think until recently BBC World still had a PAL analogue presentation
suite - so there is that composite subcarrier to contend with as well.

No idea if it will be moving to 16:9 digital distribution anytime soon -
suspect it won't be.

Quote:

In terms of content, however, BBC World tends to be very
Euro/Asia-centric. It's coverage of US news is, to say the least, basic
and it's coverage of Canada is almost non-existent. I flew to Italy last
June 28 which was the day of Canada's federal election (I voted in the
advance poll). On the 29th there was absolutely _nothing_ on BBC World re
the election. I had to contact the Canadian Consulate to learn the
results.

Whilst I can see your point about Canada - BBC World DO co-present a number
of their UK late night bulletins (US peak time?) from Washington and London,
and their World Business Report is also co-anchored from London and New
York - which does imply slightly more coverage than you suggest. I think
the idea behind World is to cover different parts of the globe at different
times of the day - so if you watch at different times of day you may well
get a different view of the editorial agenda. It also carries quite a lot
of news from the Indian subcontinent at some times of the day - as BBC World
is very popular in this region I believe.

Quote:

Interestingly the domestic commercial channels the BBC operates in
association with Flextech (UKTV - UKTV Style, UKTV People, UKTV Food,
UKTV Drama etc.) are all still decidedly 4:3 - even though almost all of
their modern output (repeats of recent BBC productions) is originated in
16:9. Very tedious for the many viewers in the UK with 16:9 TVs and
digital receivers capable of receiving 16:9 FHA broadcasts (Most of the
domestic production,plus quite a few imports, on the main 5 networks in
the UK, plus some of the Sky Pay TV services is in 16:9 FHA SDTV) - but
we are stuck with 14:9 letterbox in a 4:3 frame for most UKTV stuff.

Also, I'm aware that when "Frasier" switched to widescreen HDTV for its
final two seasons, it was shown in the UK only in the 4x3 aspect ratio.

Yep - though having seen the 16:9 versions I see we didn't miss much... It
did look like it was very much shot for 4:3 centre-cut-out rather than
letterbox display, with the widescreen edges completely redundant. The OC
has also been running in 4:3 over here - though it is originated widescreen
and being shown on Channel Four which shows a lot of stuff in 16:9 FHA on
its digital outlets. When this was raised with Channel Four (who also show
Frasier) it was blamed on the lack of an acceptable quality 625 16:9 master
from the distributors - maybe they were only offering decent 60i->24p->50i
DEFT conversions on the 4:3 version, with 16:9 versions being converted
straight 60i->50i. (This was the case with the 625 16:9 versions of the
first series of 24 shown in the UK - widescreen but covered in standards
conversion 3:2 pulldown artefacts- really horrid to watch compared to a
decent 3:2 pulldown removed DEFT conversion)

Quote:

Plus, with news networks relying heavily on standards conversions
between 50hz and 60hz, even HDTV will look pretty crappy.

Yep - and also DSNG links used for newsgathering and exchange are all
pretty low bit rate MPEG2 at SD level. The costs for distributing in HD
would be much higher.

Because so much of it is done on-the-fly, the video quality of most ENG
tends to be pretty wretched.

Hmm - seems to be improving in the UK. Quite a lot of stuff remains
entirely in the digital domain over here - often staying DV native
throughout the editing process all the way to transmission (sometimes
passing through an SDI DSNG link first). The trick to keeping the quality
up is avoiding PAL composite analogue links, shooting 16:9 where possible,
and avoiding multiple compression stages.

It is interesting how often agency stuff sticks out by looking so soft and
covered in artefacts these days, and how poor a lot of the 525/625
conversions are.

Quote:
Leaves me wondering why the networks bother using those pricey industrial
cameras when most of the stuff looks like it was shot with a cheap VHS
consumer cam.


Well increasingly ENG stuff IS being shot using professional badged (and
slightly re-engineered) versions of high-end domestic miniDV Camcorders -
though the higher end 16:9 ENG stuff (usually a DVCam DSR500 or similar in
the UK) can look really nice (especially if edited from the source tapes,
rather than a copy fed over a microwave or DSNG link)

Ironically it is often the live shots that look cleanest and sharpest these
days...

Quote:
The Beeb - who are the only 16:9 news operation of any size I believe -
still shoot significant amounts of 4:3 material overseas. 16:9 reports
and lives DO appear from places like Baghdad, Pakistan and even parts of
Africa, however the reports are often more "featurey" - relying entirely
on BBC-shot footage (often edited back in London). In cases where
reports use pooled material, stuff shot by broadcasters (like ABC) who
work with the BBC, or lots of local agency footage, it is still common
for most stuff to be 4:3 originated, converted to 16:9 via a 14:9
pillarbox system. The Beeb are pretty universally 4:3 in the US
though - only a, now closed, LA operation ran 525/60 16:9 for an
entertainment news programme.

In Canada, UK programs tend to be 14x9 letterbox.


Yep - I think BBC Worldwide often offer 14:9 letterbox and 4:3 full-frame
versions - though the 14:9 framing will often look nicer.

Steve
Back to top
manitou910
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:49 am    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

Stephen Neal wrote:
Quote:

Also, I'm aware that when "Frasier" switched to widescreen HDTV for its
final two seasons, it was shown in the UK only in the 4x3 aspect ratio.

Yep - though having seen the 16:9 versions I see we didn't miss much... It
did look like it was very much shot for 4:3 centre-cut-out rather than
letterbox display, with the widescreen edges completely redundant. The OC
has also been running in 4:3 over here - though it is originated widescreen
and being shown on Channel Four which shows a lot of stuff in 16:9 FHA on
its digital outlets. When this was raised with Channel Four (who also show
Frasier) it was blamed on the lack of an acceptable quality 625 16:9 master
from the distributors - maybe they were only offering decent 60i->24p->50i
DEFT conversions on the 4:3 version, with 16:9 versions being converted
straight 60i->50i. (This was the case with the 625 16:9 versions of the
first series of 24 shown in the UK - widescreen but covered in standards
conversion 3:2 pulldown artefacts- really horrid to watch compared to a
decent 3:2 pulldown removed DEFT conversion)

I'm aware the first season of "The O.C." was displayed by FOX in 480p.
FOX reportedly is switching to 720p for its major dramas this season.

However, the masters for the last two seasons of "Frasier" definitely
were 1080i, from 3-perf Super-35 film shot at 24fps, which should easily
downconvert to widescreen PAL.

The final season of "Frasier" looked more obviously 'protected' for 4x3
than did S10.

Forthcoming DVDs of "The O.C." S1 and "Frasier" S11 will be 4x3.






C.
Back to top
Stephen Neal
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:22 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

"manitou910" <manitou910@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:U_GdncGm0uYveB_cRVn-sA@rogers.com...
[snip]
Quote:
I'm aware the first season of "The O.C." was displayed by FOX in 480p. FOX
reportedly is switching to 720p for its major dramas this season.


Well 480p stuff should be relatively easily converted to 480/60i 3:2 which
again is easily converted to 576/50i 2:2 using DEFT techniques (looking for
the redundant 3rd field in the 3:2 pulldown sequence to create a 480/48i
sequence, scaling this to 576/48i and recording this onto modified 576/50i
VTRs that will run at 48i for recording purposes) The other option,
depending on the post-production route, is to just play out a 50i version
from your non-linear editor if it is edited 24p. (Quantel support 24p
editing, allowing real-time playout at either 480/60i adding 3:2 on the fly,
or real-time playout at 576/50i playing out a little faster. They recommend
telecineing 24p film material in the SD domain at 576p to keep the
resolution up)

However I suspect that DEFT conversions (which are more expensive) are used
only for the 4:3 576/50i transfers which are required globally - whereas the
16:9 576/50i stuff is required by only a few territories at the moment (UK
and Aus, though some other European countries might also be interested they
mayalso need foreign language dubs as well?)

Channel Four - like most other broadcasters - will prioritise standards
conversion quality over aspect ratio - so will always chose the higher
quality transfer. In fact they stipulate DEFT-style clean transfers in
their programme acquisition guidelines I think.

Quote:
However, the masters for the last two seasons of "Frasier" definitely were
1080i, from 3-perf Super-35 film shot at 24fps, which should easily
downconvert to widescreen PAL.

Yep - again it is a case of the costs I guess. Doing a 1080i/24p to 576/50i
conversion using 2:2 pull-down and speed-up requires some effort I guess -
do 1080/24p VTRs allow replay at 25p - allowing a straight 1080/25p 16:9 to
576/50i 16:9 downconversion ? I'd hope so - though the audio must be fun. I
suspect that at the moment a single 4:3 576/50i transfer from either the
16:9 1080/24p source, or worse a 4:3 480/60i 3:2 downconversion, is made.
(At least the 480/60i 3:2 can be un-3:2ed to 576/48i using DEFT stuff
though!)

Quote:

The final season of "Frasier" looked more obviously 'protected' for 4x3
than did S10.

Yep - I didn't feel I was missing much in 4:3 - though it would have been
nice to have pictures where my black pillar-box bars were.

Quote:

Forthcoming DVDs of "The O.C." S1 and "Frasier" S11 will be 4x3.

That is a real shame - what a let down. The OC S1 is out already in the
UK - I'll check and see what AR it is next time I'm in a DVD section in
town.

Steve
Back to top
manitou910
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 5:12 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

Stephen Neal wrote:
Quote:

I'm aware the first season of "The O.C." was displayed by FOX in 480p. FOX
reportedly is switching to 720p for its major dramas this season.

Well 480p stuff should be relatively easily converted to 480/60i 3:2 which
again is easily converted to 576/50i 2:2 using DEFT techniques (looking for
the redundant 3rd field in the 3:2 pulldown sequence to create a 480/48i
sequence, scaling this to 576/48i and recording this onto modified 576/50i
VTRs that will run at 48i for recording purposes) The other option,
depending on the post-production route, is to just play out a 50i version
from your non-linear editor if it is edited 24p. (Quantel support 24p
editing, allowing real-time playout at either 480/60i adding 3:2 on the fly,
or real-time playout at 576/50i playing out a little faster. They recommend
telecineing 24p film material in the SD domain at 576p to keep the
resolution up)

However I suspect that DEFT conversions (which are more expensive) are used
only for the 4:3 576/50i transfers which are required globally - whereas the
16:9 576/50i stuff is required by only a few territories at the moment (UK
and Aus, though some other European countries might also be interested they
mayalso need foreign language dubs as well?)

But isn't the foreign dubbing usually done in the designated countries?
IINM France won't allow movies _not_ dubbed in France to be shown.
And I doubt that even in a country as large as the USA there are enough
bilingual and/or multilingual actors to enable preparation of dubbed
films and/or TV series for export to other nations (with or without
providing requisite standards conversions).

Quote:
Channel Four - like most other broadcasters - will prioritise standards
conversion quality over aspect ratio - so will always chose the higher
quality transfer. In fact they stipulate DEFT-style clean transfers in
their programme acquisition guidelines I think.

However, the masters for the last two seasons of "Frasier" definitely were
1080i, from 3-perf Super-35 film shot at 24fps, which should easily
downconvert to widescreen PAL.

Yep - again it is a case of the costs I guess. Doing a 1080i/24p to 576/50i
conversion using 2:2 pull-down and speed-up requires some effort I guess -

I'm not even sure why NBC made the switch to HDTV for the final seasons
of "Frasier", since the show was treated quite shabbily by the network
and Jeff Zucker during its later years, unless this was a decision by
Paramount. "Friends", which ended at the same time, never went HiDef,
and "Will & Grace" still is being shown only in 4x3, though uprezed to
1080i for NBC's HDT stations (and looks very good).

Quote:
do 1080/24p VTRs allow replay at 25p - allowing a straight 1080/25p 16:9 to
576/50i 16:9 downconversion ? I'd hope so - though the audio must be fun.

If you go to sony.com and check out their industrial gear you should
find the answer to this question. For obvious reasons the audio speedup
would be more of a problem than downrezing 1080 lines to 576. Faroudja
processing chips should be able to do the latter very easily.

Nevertheless, I don't think it's an issue of VTR technology so much as
the NLE. I'd expect that AVID Film Composer for 1080i would have the
requisite software to downconvert to both NTSC and PAL specs, though I'm
not absolutely certain of this. (My AVID Xpress doesn't do conversions,
but can be set to function for both NTSC and PAL.)

Quote:
I suspect that at the moment a single 4:3 576/50i transfer from either the
16:9 1080/24p source, or worse a 4:3 480/60i 3:2 downconversion, is made.
(At least the 480/60i 3:2 can be un-3:2ed to 576/48i using DEFT stuff
though!)

I'm pretty sure this has always been the method. For the first two
years the color on "Frasier" was atrocious (and wasn't fixed for the
DVDs), and UK friends reported this was also the case for PAL telecasts
of the show.

Quote:
The final season of "Frasier" looked more obviously 'protected' for 4x3
than did S10.

Yep - I didn't feel I was missing much in 4:3 - though it would have been
nice to have pictures where my black pillar-box bars were.

The main advantage of the widescreen HDTV versions was you got to see
the sets in way more detail and, of course, the color was spectacular.

Quote:
Forthcoming DVDs of "The O.C." S1 and "Frasier" S11 will be 4x3.

That is a real shame - what a let down. The OC S1 is out already in the
UK - I'll check and see what AR it is next time I'm in a DVD section in
town.

Paramount probably figured that most people who watch "Frasier" and will
buy the S11 DVDs still have older 4x3 sets. Apparently they're
releasing the final season because it was so well received (it was
astoundingly good, in part because both Joe Keenan and Christopher Lloyd
were brought back as showrunners and writers).

However I don't understand why FOX wouldn't release "The O.C." in
widescreen since DVDs for "The X-Files" were widescreen consistent with
that show's switch to 16x9, circa S4 or 5 -- and the transfers were
superlative.






C.
Back to top
Stephen Neal
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:39 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC World TV + CBC Newsworld + RDI : when will they go t Reply with quote

"manitou910" <manitou910@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:qMCdnRwNUOlEDh7cRVn-rw@rogers.com...
Quote:
Stephen Neal wrote:

[snip]
But isn't the foreign dubbing usually done in the designated countries?
IINM France won't allow movies _not_ dubbed in France to be shown. And I
doubt that even in a country as large as the USA there are enough
bilingual and/or multilingual actors to enable preparation of dubbed films
and/or TV series for export to other nations (with or without providing
requisite standards conversions).

That is a very good point! I suspect you are right on the money there.

[snip]

Quote:
I'm not even sure why NBC made the switch to HDTV for the final seasons of
"Frasier", since the show was treated quite shabbily by the network and
Jeff Zucker during its later years, unless this was a decision by
Paramount. "Friends", which ended at the same time, never went HiDef, and
"Will & Grace" still is being shown only in 4x3, though uprezed to 1080i
for NBC's HDT stations (and looks very good).

Is it likely that the upconversion for Will and Grace is done by the network
rather than local affiliates, so will be sourced from a digital component,
rather than NTSC analogue, feed? If so then you'll presumably benefit from
full luma and chroma bandwith that 4:2:2 production provides over NTSC
analogue and a 6MHz transmission channel?

Quote:

do 1080/24p VTRs allow replay at 25p - allowing a straight 1080/25p 16:9
to 576/50i 16:9 downconversion ? I'd hope so - though the audio must be
fun.

If you go to sony.com and check out their industrial gear you should find
the answer to this question.

Yep - was just being lazy. I suspect both Sony and Panasonic VTRs will be
available that do this - though haven't confirmed. In fact I'm pretty
certain this is the case - as ISTR that the UK series Rockface, which was
shot and edited 1080/25p was downconverted to 24p for US co-production
partners via a slow-down (and I think this show was online conformed on VT
rather than an NLE) I also STR that the audio was an interesting obstacle
course from articles that the Beeb production team wrote after series 1.

Quote:
For obvious reasons the audio speedup would be more of a problem than
downrezing 1080 lines to 576. Faroudja processing chips should be able to
do the latter very easily.

Hmm - Faroudja don't seem to be quite so "big" a name in UK broadcast
circles - I suspect Snell and Wilcox stuff is used more over here for cross-
and down-conversion.

Quote:

Nevertheless, I don't think it's an issue of VTR technology so much as the
NLE. I'd expect that AVID Film Composer for 1080i would have the
requisite software to downconvert to both NTSC and PAL specs, though I'm
not absolutely certain of this.

Yep - I think that most high-end NLEs that support 24p production will allow
for either 60i 3:2 or 50i 2:2 playout (possibly 48i 2:2?) - though they may
require rendering time I guess. The Quantel systems do this with some extra
hardware ISTR - so can playout the 50i and 60i versions live on-the-fly I
believe. (But you pay extra for the Quantel gear...)

Quote:
(My AVID Xpress doesn't do conversions, but can be set to function for both
NTSC and PAL.)

Yep - though presumably you'd ignore NTSC or PAL and chose 24p if you were
editing 24p material.

(The Quantel SD solution - which I think a few US producers utilised -
entailed shoooting 24p film, transferring at 25p/50i 576 lines, editing this
material as if it were 24p, then playing out at 60i with a down-res or 50i
at the same res. Kept the best quality for all SD destinations - and didn't
require any fancy hardware upgrades - as existing telecines were fine in
576/50i mode)

Quote:

I suspect that at the moment a single 4:3 576/50i transfer from either
the 16:9 1080/24p source, or worse a 4:3 480/60i 3:2 downconversion, is
made. (At least the 480/60i 3:2 can be un-3:2ed to 576/48i using DEFT
stuff though!)

I'm pretty sure this has always been the method. For the first two years
the color on "Frasier" was atrocious (and wasn't fixed for the DVDs), and
UK friends reported this was also the case for PAL telecasts of the show.

I suspect if the show was edited on tape this had to be the case, and even
if edited on film they may have saved money by only doing a 480/60i telecine
pass / grade, just passing the final 480/60i tape master through a DEFT (or
worse, non-DEFT) converter.

Quote:

The final season of "Frasier" looked more obviously 'protected' for 4x3
than did S10.

Yep - I didn't feel I was missing much in 4:3 - though it would have been
nice to have pictures where my black pillar-box bars were.

The main advantage of the widescreen HDTV versions was you got to see the
sets in way more detail and, of course, the color was spectacular.


Though presumably the colour will have been pretty near identical to the
component digital (not a hint of PAL or NSTC subcarrier) we will have seen
in the UK via our DTV delivery schemes. (The show will have been sourced
from DigiBeta or SD D5 - Channel Four chose standard def D5 as their main
delivery format when they went component digital in the mid 90s - and
broadcast component digital. UK DVB set top boxes and TVs pretty much all
have RGB video output/inputs so the colour should have been similar - though
the chromaticity of HD and SD is slightly different - and I don't know if
the conversions take this into account or not?)

Quote:
Forthcoming DVDs of "The O.C." S1 and "Frasier" S11 will be 4x3.

That is a real shame - what a let down. The OC S1 is out already in the
UK - I'll check and see what AR it is next time I'm in a DVD section in
town.

Paramount probably figured that most people who watch "Frasier" and will
buy the S11 DVDs still have older 4x3 sets. Apparently they're releasing
the final season because it was so well received (it was astoundingly
good, in part because both Joe Keenan and Christopher Lloyd were brought
back as showrunners and writers).

Hmm - maybe that means the UK release will be treated differently. 16:9 is
now very much the norm for all DVD releases over here - though in the cases
of very early releases 16:9 letterbox transfers in 4:3 rather than 16:9
anamorphic transfers were released. Thankfully this is no longer the case.
I wonder - we'll have to wait and see. AIUI the latest West Wing DVDs
released in the UK are 16:9 FHA.

Quote:

However I don't understand why FOX wouldn't release "The O.C." in
widescreen since DVDs for "The X-Files" were widescreen consistent with
that show's switch to 16x9, circa S4 or 5 -- and the transfers were
superlative.


No - that does seem strange. Wonder if it is at all related to the
difficulty C4 have in getting a 16:9 master for transmission over here.
Suspect not, but you do wonder!

(Could it be that broadcast sales and DVD release are dealt with the same,
different, arm of the organisation to domestic broadcast?)

Steve
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DVD-Software.info Forum Index -> TV Technology All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Office Forum Access Forum Windows Server Exchange Server

Powered by phpBB