| Author |
Message |
leo
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:49 pm Post subject:
progressive scan |
|
|
Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting video to be
shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan or interlaced.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nappy-iou
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:49 pm Post subject:
Re: progressive scan |
|
|
interlaced.
"leo" <dusty-roads@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Yu7kd.10058$Gm6.8089@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting video to be
shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan or interlaced.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johan Stäck
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:53 am Post subject:
Re: progressive scan |
|
|
leo wrote:
| Quote: | Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting video to be
shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan or interlaced.
Precisely, |
The way of recording your video (interlaced/non-interlaced) should
reflect the intended playback equipment.
For household TV sets that means interlaced.
/Johan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nappy-iou
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:02 am Post subject:
Re: progressive scan |
|
|
movement will be jerky . try it and watch what happens.
"leo" <dusty-roads@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:_Eckd.6289$_J2.3501@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | So it is interlasced for viewing on TV, but what happens if I shoot
progressive (30 frames or 24) and show it on TV, what would be the
results?
"leo" <dusty-roads@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Yu7kd.10058$Gm6.8089@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting video to be
shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan or interlaced.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
leo
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:02 am Post subject:
Re: progressive scan |
|
|
what happens if I recored progressive 24 or 30 frames and show it on a TV,
what would be the results?
"Johan Stäck" <johan@stack.se> wrote in message
news:2vcsihF2kb2fgU1@uni-berlin.de...
| Quote: | leo wrote:
Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting video to be
shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan or interlaced.
Precisely,
The way of recording your video (interlaced/non-interlaced) should reflect
the intended playback equipment.
For household TV sets that means interlaced.
/Johan |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
leo
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:02 am Post subject:
Re: progressive scan |
|
|
So it is interlasced for viewing on TV, but what happens if I shoot
progressive (30 frames or 24) and show it on TV, what would be the results?
"leo" <dusty-roads@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Yu7kd.10058$Gm6.8089@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting video to be
shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan or interlaced.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gene E. Bloch
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:30 am Post subject:
Re: progressive scan |
|
|
"leo" <dusty-roads@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:USckd.6298$_J2.5861@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:
| Quote: | what happens if I recored progressive 24 or 30 frames and show it
on a TV, what would be the results?
|
Try it and let us know.
Gino
| Quote: |
"Johan Stäck" <johan@stack.se> wrote in message
news:2vcsihF2kb2fgU1@uni-berlin.de...
leo wrote:
Let me see if I am in the right thought on this. If shooting
video to be shown on TV, is it better to shoot progressive scan
or interlaced.
Precisely,
The way of recording your video (interlaced/non-interlaced)
should reflect the intended playback equipment.
For household TV sets that means interlaced.
/Johan
|
--
Gene E. Bloch (Gino) phone 650.966.8481
Call me letters find me at domain blochg whose dot is com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in