| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:35 pm Post subject:
wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
The club where I work has a guy walking around in front
of the stage carrying a camera (is there a proper term for
that?). The signal cable and communication cable are
a great hindrance. Can anyone suggest a decent but
affordable system to send the video signal no more than
150', not having to go through any walls. Could a bunch
of people interfere with the signal, if they get between the
transmitter and the receiver?
What could we do about the cable for the com system?
It's not Clear-Com, but is compatible.
Thanks for any help!
David
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugsy57
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:12 pm Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
<dh_ld@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:8242o0lssteldonbi9q5333r13se30e8pu@4ax.com...
| Quote: | The club where I work has a guy walking around in front
of the stage carrying a camera (is there a proper term for
that?).
|
Yes, it's called a camera man |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Guidry
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:07 am Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
Check the Markertek web site. I think they have a wireless camera link
system for less than $1k that's pretty good. You will need a wireless
intercom system as well. If you can get by with some FRS radios and
earpieces, that's probably the cheapest way, but if this is a continuing
operation, you will quickly tire of the normal difficulties of this setup.
My guess is that you'll pay more for the intercom system - - get clearcom or
RTS, don't fool around with pretenders - - than you would for the camera
link.
Steve
<dh_ld@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:8242o0lssteldonbi9q5333r13se30e8pu@4ax.com...
| Quote: | The club where I work has a guy walking around in front
of the stage carrying a camera (is there a proper term for
that?). The signal cable and communication cable are
a great hindrance. Can anyone suggest a decent but
affordable system to send the video signal no more than
150', not having to go through any walls. Could a bunch
of people interfere with the signal, if they get between the
transmitter and the receiver?
What could we do about the cable for the com system?
It's not Clear-Com, but is compatible.
Thanks for any help!
David |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luminos
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:47 am Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
I went to the web site...this may be junk, but it is cheap:
http://www.markertek.com/Product.asp?baseItem=CL%2DAV5000&cat=VIDEOEQUIP&subcat=&prodClass=WRLESSV&mfg=&search=0&off=
"Steve Guidry" <steveguidrynospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Fcdgd.10037$KJ6.1108@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | Check the Markertek web site. I think they have a wireless camera link
system for less than $1k that's pretty good. You will need a wireless
intercom system as well. If you can get by with some FRS radios and
earpieces, that's probably the cheapest way, but if this is a continuing
operation, you will quickly tire of the normal difficulties of this setup.
My guess is that you'll pay more for the intercom system - - get clearcom
or
RTS, don't fool around with pretenders - - than you would for the camera
link.
Steve
dh_ld@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:8242o0lssteldonbi9q5333r13se30e8pu@4ax.com...
The club where I work has a guy walking around in front
of the stage carrying a camera (is there a proper term for
that?). The signal cable and communication cable are
a great hindrance. Can anyone suggest a decent but
affordable system to send the video signal no more than
150', not having to go through any walls. Could a bunch
of people interfere with the signal, if they get between the
transmitter and the receiver?
What could we do about the cable for the com system?
It's not Clear-Com, but is compatible.
Thanks for any help!
David
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Guidry
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:02 pm Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
Markertek's marketing strategy is to have a professional grade product for
each application, as well as a "pretty good" consumer or prosumer product.
By the price, I'm pretty sure that this is the consumer model.
I'd expect a professional solution to cost $800 to $1000 for even minimum
capability. last time I checked, the full bandwidth ones that are used for
"real TV" were about $4k or more, depending on accessories.
Depending on how critical the application is, I'd be tempted to give the $99
solution a try. At that price, it's a throw-away, even if Markertek won't
take it back.
Steve
"luminos" <logos1@trip.net> wrote in message
news:10o2q7dra71sk86@news20.forteinc.com...
| Quote: | I went to the web site...this may be junk, but it is cheap:
http://www.markertek.com/Product.asp?baseItem=CL%2DAV5000&cat=VIDEOEQUIP&subcat=&prodClass=WRLESSV&mfg=&search=0&off=
"Steve Guidry" <steveguidrynospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Fcdgd.10037$KJ6.1108@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Check the Markertek web site. I think they have a wireless camera link
system for less than $1k that's pretty good. You will need a wireless
intercom system as well. If you can get by with some FRS radios and
earpieces, that's probably the cheapest way, but if this is a continuing
operation, you will quickly tire of the normal difficulties of this
setup.
My guess is that you'll pay more for the intercom system - - get
clearcom
or
RTS, don't fool around with pretenders - - than you would for the camera
link.
Steve
dh_ld@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:8242o0lssteldonbi9q5333r13se30e8pu@4ax.com...
The club where I work has a guy walking around in front
of the stage carrying a camera (is there a proper term for
that?). The signal cable and communication cable are
a great hindrance. Can anyone suggest a decent but
affordable system to send the video signal no more than
150', not having to go through any walls. Could a bunch
of people interfere with the signal, if they get between the
transmitter and the receiver?
What could we do about the cable for the com system?
It's not Clear-Com, but is compatible.
Thanks for any help!
David
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:14 am Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
In article <aQtgd.10813$KJ6.9734
@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
steveguidrynospam@earthlink.net says...
| Quote: | Markertek's marketing strategy is to have a professional grade product for
each application, as well as a "pretty good" consumer or prosumer product.
By the price, I'm pretty sure that this is the consumer model.
I'd expect a professional solution to cost $800 to $1000 for even minimum
capability. last time I checked, the full bandwidth ones that are used for
"real TV" were about $4k or more, depending on accessories.
Depending on how critical the application is, I'd be tempted to give the $99
solution a try. At that price, it's a throw-away, even if Markertek won't
take it back.
Steve
|
I have the $99 version and it works just fine with ONE
caveat.
BOTH the reciever and the transmitter MUST be carefully
aimed at each other and cannot be moved or you will lose
the signal.
Straight line aiming is easy, through any walls or soft
obstructions you must aim in directions you dont expect to
find where the signal "sneaks" through.
--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ryan Boni
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:08 am Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
Actually, that $99 system is not too bad. We have that one that's listed on
the Markertek site and have used it for quite a few smaller applications,
when we didn't want to run either really long cable runs or cable runs in
busy walking areas. I wouldn't rely on it to work and be clean all the
time, but if you're using it for non essential work, it's a great little
system.
We've used it to send video program feeds into our pressbox for announcers;
send a signal a couple hundred feet from our stadium to a school building
for in-house overflow viewing, to send video across an auditorium to a
projector. That sort of stuff works great.
You've got to get the two little antennas to face each other pretty close to
line of sight or you start getting interference and some significant signal
loss.
So for a camera man that's walking around on the front of the stage, you
would need the transmitter to sit stationary somewhere and run a cable from
the camera to it. If you're looking for something totally portable, you're
probably going to have to get a lot more expensive unit. Typically, when
you see a totally wireless camera working in a professional application,
there's a 2nd person trailing the camera operator, pointing a transmitter at
some receiver location.
Ryan
--
---------------------------------------------
Ryan Boni
Public Access Director
Peters Township Community Television
McMurray, PA
www.geocities.com/ptct7/
"luminos" <logos1@trip.net> wrote in message
news:10o2q7dra71sk86@news20.forteinc.com...
cat=&prodClass=WRLESSV&mfg=&search=0&off=
| Quote: |
"Steve Guidry" <steveguidrynospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Fcdgd.10037$KJ6.1108@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Check the Markertek web site. I think they have a wireless camera link
system for less than $1k that's pretty good. You will need a wireless
intercom system as well. If you can get by with some FRS radios and
earpieces, that's probably the cheapest way, but if this is a continuing
operation, you will quickly tire of the normal difficulties of this
setup.
My guess is that you'll pay more for the intercom system - - get
clearcom
or
RTS, don't fool around with pretenders - - than you would for the camera
link.
Steve
dh_ld@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:8242o0lssteldonbi9q5333r13se30e8pu@4ax.com...
The club where I work has a guy walking around in front
of the stage carrying a camera (is there a proper term for
that?). The signal cable and communication cable are
a great hindrance. Can anyone suggest a decent but
affordable system to send the video signal no more than
150', not having to go through any walls. Could a bunch
of people interfere with the signal, if they get between the
transmitter and the receiver?
What could we do about the cable for the com system?
It's not Clear-Com, but is compatible.
Thanks for any help!
David
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Guidry
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:53 pm Post subject:
Re: wireless video transmission systems??? |
|
|
That's exactly the kind of stuff I'd expect from a "pretty good" consumer
product. I guess their strategy is working.
For a truly professional system, expect to pay a lot more.
Steve
"Larry" <lastingimagery@comcast.dotnet> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bec6ea59e3f5454989792@news.comcast.giganews.com...
| Quote: | In article <aQtgd.10813$KJ6.9734
@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
steveguidrynospam@earthlink.net says...
Markertek's marketing strategy is to have a professional grade product
for
each application, as well as a "pretty good" consumer or prosumer
product.
By the price, I'm pretty sure that this is the consumer model.
I'd expect a professional solution to cost $800 to $1000 for even
minimum
capability. last time I checked, the full bandwidth ones that are used
for
"real TV" were about $4k or more, depending on accessories.
Depending on how critical the application is, I'd be tempted to give the
$99
solution a try. At that price, it's a throw-away, even if Markertek
won't
take it back.
Steve
I have the $99 version and it works just fine with ONE
caveat.
BOTH the reciever and the transmitter MUST be carefully
aimed at each other and cannot be moved or you will lose
the signal.
Straight line aiming is easy, through any walls or soft
obstructions you must aim in directions you dont expect to
find where the signal "sneaks" through.
--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|