| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject:
Re: FS: Samsung SV3000W 'Worldwide' VCR |
|
|
On 22 Sep 2005 01:09:59 -0700, "lordretsudo" <lordretsudo@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
| Quote: | 6 head multi-standard VCR. Records, plays and converts between NTSC,
PAL and SECAM (plus NTSC4.43, PAL-M, PAL-N and MESECAM). Unlike some
other multi-standard VCR's, it also has a proper tape counter (H:MM:SS)
and a TV tuner.
Review:
http://www.audioreview.com/VCRs/Samsung+SV-3000W/PRD_117514_1588crx.aspx
Absolutely mint condition, with instruction manual and remote control.
Cost me around £600 - looking for £180 or thereabouts, including
delivery. If you have any questions please feel free to e-mail me:
lordretsudo AT ntlworld DOT com
TIA, Tom
|
I can vouch for this fine collector/trader of asian films.
And for the samsung machines. I have 3.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Berger
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:28 am Post subject:
Re: FS: Samsung SV3000W 'Worldwide' VCR |
|
|
Are they that difficult to keep running?
john339077353@cs.com wrote:
| Quote: | I can vouch for this fine collector/trader of asian films.
And for the samsung machines. I have 3. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:02 am Post subject:
Re: inexpensive teleprompter software |
|
|
I checked out the site that was supplied in the first response to my
posting. I can assure you that this is not the same product. There is no
hardware associated with this software, beyond the use of your own laptop
computer.
I did make a mistake in the name. It should read "EzPrompt"tm Ver 1.0, and
it is copywrited by B.H.Heck Jr. 2005. This is not commercial software, but
rather a very nice shareware program. It has enough functionality to be a
useful semi-professional tool, without the complex functionality that would
make it expensive and commercial. In time, future versions may be large
exotic programs, but this version is a simple effective tool set that does
an adequate job for a very reasonable price.
As for being pirated . . . I doubt it! It's one thing to sell pirated
programs at a flea market or yard sale on disc, quite another to do so on a
legal service like EBay. It would be all too easy for a software pirate to
get busted doing so. EBay maintains records of every buyer and seller as
well as every transaction. They make it a point to verify this information
to prevent just this type of thing. I am fairly certain (99%) that the
product I purchased is legitimate and legal. In fact, the password that
unlocks the programs functionality is a series of biblical references, not
exactly the hallmark of a professional team of software engineers. :) It
just doesn't ring of a criminal act.
As for how this affects me ethically . . . I will continue to use this
software with a clear conscience until such time as someone gives me proof
that this software is anything but completely legal! Wild accusations based
on zero knowledge or factual evidence do not sway my opinion of the product
I bought and paid for, nor the person who sold it to me!
As for being on deadline . . . Anyone working at a level and capacity that
requires stringent scheduling and deadlines should consider purchasing
proven professional products for thier purposes. I would never think of
trying to be a cheapskate on the tools of my profession. This is hobby, or
no budget semi pro level software. Anyone trying to pass themselves off as
professional should think about that. If I were shooting professionally, I
would not hesitate to pay the price for professional level tools.
I did professional level still photography for a few years, and I can tell
you that I would never think of going out with rookie low budget equipment.
On any given day my camera bag of tools was worth enough to pay for a small
house. I'm just getting started with video work, and therefore, would never
try to pass myself off as professional until I have the knowledge, equipment
and experience to perform at that capacity. Anyone who has actually worked
professionally knows this already. You simply would not stay in business
very long. Any artform of this type requires that the operator produce an
end result worthy of the price charged. See what happens to you when you
mess up someones wedding photos or video. The money you saved on cheap
equipment will be spent many times over paying lawers.
Speaking of lawers . . . You may want to buffer down your opinion before you
make such legally binding public allegations concerning the perpetration of
a criminal act. UM . . . I AM NOT BUYING PIRATED SOFTWARE to the best of my
knowledge. Be careful what you post, you are legally liable for public
allegations, slander, defamation and such that you perform on the internet!
--
With all due respect |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nobody special
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:41 am Post subject:
Re: inexpensive teleprompter software |
|
|
Um, the makers of the shareware usually sell it from their own branded
site, not ebay.
My guess is because it's on ebay, it has been used by someone, they
paid the shareware fee to unlock the software, and now are re-selling
the shareware key they bought to you, ata deep discount. He can afford
the deep discount because he's selling the same copy many times over
and makes it up on volume.
The maker of that shareware doesn't get a cent out of this deal. The
guy selling it to you on ebay can still keep a copy of that cracked
shareware and re-sell the same keys ad infinitum, and again, the
creator of that software you're so fond of is not seeing a dime from
this.
It is my "concern", shall we put it, that by buying the keys on ebay,
you are indeed supporting crackers and/or pirates. It's the same as
buying VHS dubs of a movie the first guy paid full price for.
And if you think your "biblical reference" keycodes *must* mean the guy
is honest, I have a piece of the True Cross I'd like to sell you. My
friend, a government official in Nigeria, is holding onto it for me and
only needs a small fee to pay the customs on it...
Or you can prove I'm a fool, call the software company and tell them
what you have, see if I'm wrong.
BTW, if you're looking for some awesome, inexpensive prompting
software for PC's and PC laptops, look into Telescript 32 from
DRS-Digitrax. They let you download a complete working demo to try,
free. Every fifth line of text it adds a nag phrase until you pay for
the codes to unlock it. It comes in light verson that's WAY cheap, and
a heavier version that mops the floor with software costing thousands.
Runs on anything from a 486 to the latest models.
I'm a big fan with a small budget, like many of you. This is a great
option to try. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:41 am Post subject:
Re: FS: Samsung SV3000W 'Worldwide' VCR |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:28:30 -0500, Mike Berger <berger@shout.net>
wrote:
| Quote: | Are they that difficult to keep running?
john339077353@cs.com wrote:
I can vouch for this fine collector/trader of asian films.
And for the samsung machines. I have 3.
|
Hahahahaha good one Mike. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnotherEddie
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:52 pm Post subject:
Re: Using Firewire between PC and standalone DVD-recorder |
|
|
If you were to copy from a DVD drive on your Mac to the standalone
recorder, how would you do it - eg get the data from the DVD drive to go
over the firewire interface ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Graciela Ynoub
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:31 am Post subject:
Re: El enfermito |
|
|
¿Tendrá que ver Edmundo con esto?
Por lo de "No se arrebate, mi prienda", digo...
http://www.clarin.com/diario/2005/10/03/sociedad/s-02801.htm
"Graciela Ynoub" <gynoub@candelaria.gov.ar> escribió en el mensaje
news:43419212$0$89247$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
| Quote: |
"Aten" <Aten@USA.net> escribió en el mensaje
news:jds0k1t6j21n8cj28n2l3lupiq29lol11e@4ax.com...
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:21:40 +0200, usenet <god@vatican.com> wrote:
Aten a écrit :
Víctor Arevalo Menchaca publicando en este con el alias de Fortinbras
publico los nombres, direcciones y todos los datos completos de
Edmundo y sus negocios,
Mira, Edmundo, por mas que te hagas ahora el Aten, sos mas facil de
identificar que la ruda. Fortinbras no "publico" nada que vos no
hubieses publicado previamente. Sos vos el que empezo a hinchar las
pelotas en este medio con tus negocios, dando el nombre de tu empresa,
dando la direccion de tu "site" y asi sucesivamente.
Vos sos un hijo de mil putas que viene llorando desde hace una década
porque alguien "habría" llamado a tu jefe maricon, pero resulta que te
plegas a los otros hijos de puta que lo atacan a Edmundo porque si
nomás, porque Edundo tienen TODO lo que a ustedes le falta, TODO lo
que ustedes JAMAS van a tener.
Para mi que, a Edmundo, como diría la inefable Vicky Irala "Le funciona
mal
el cerebro o...no sé". Tal vez esto tendría origen en las frustraciones
sexuales de Edmundo. Por ejemplo, recordemos cuando a Edmundo le salieron
los primeros pelos púbicos: el pequeño y púber Edmundo quizo salir a
explorar otros pelo púbicos, pero cuando se acercaba a otras pendejas
haciéndose el langa diciendo "no se arrebate mi prienda", era repelido
violentamente por las mismas (si, hubo otro incidente parecído con la
psicóloga que posteaba en ACA...).Harto de eso, y aún con el morbo de las
niñas en uniforme del "Damas O Centeno" (colegio castrador como pocos,
hasta
que un día vino un milico tipo Galtieri que se la pasaba bebiendo y ahí el
colegio pasó del "Dios, Patria y Hogar" al "Dos, Parias o grchan hoy o
garchan domani")
No contento con eso, nuestro amigo Edmundo se fascinó con una peli porno
yanki y se embelezó con los gemidos del tipo "oh, yeah!" de las yonis y
decidió emprender el "Apple pie pussies quest" y salió en busca a la
roñosa
ciudad de Los Angeles para tratar de trincarse alguna pendeja WASP de esas
que tanto le calientan (recordemos que Edmundo es racista, clasista y
malabarista).
Un día se lo vió en Cahuenga y Wilshire, persiguiendo una pendeja de 15,
motivo por lo que casi es detenido por la policía de Los Ángeles; pero
gracias a gestiones del cónsul menemista de aquel entonces, Edmundo fué
absuelto de culpa y cargo...
Continuará....
g.
Aten.
no contento con esto, continuo sugiriendo que Edmundo no estaría
al día con sus impuestos y por lo tanto indicaba claramente
como hacer para denunciar a Edmundo con los organismos del
gobierno, esto aquí en USA es grosísimo y sin duda perjudica
a TODO aquel que el IRS (réditos) decide investigar, SIN importar
si el investigado tiene al da sus pagos de impuestos o no.
Como es eso ? En el pais que se precia de ser un dechado de libertad y
democracia un ciudadano al dia de sus obligaciones debe temer una
investigacion por parte de los servicios de control ? Como se tolera en
un pais democratico que los organismos de control "perjudiquen" a
ciudadanos inocentes ? Yo siempre dije, en ese pais no se puede
vivir...
Saludos
Mario "el franchute"
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PINKO
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:42 am Post subject:
Re: El enfermito |
|
|
"Graciela Ynoub" <gynoub@candelaria.gov.ar> wrote in message
news:434195ff$0$18054$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
Y la otra mitad, presiona a los varones. Asi es la vida.
PINKO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Howard Ring
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:15 pm Post subject:
Re: sony vs canyon |
|
|
I am not much help in choosing between Sony and Canon, I think they both
make good products. I saw that you want to use the camera to preserve
family memories, and that you are concerned about a possible tape eating
problem.
I think all MiniDV cameras eat tapes now and then. The format just isn't
that
durable. I rarely use my footage for normal playback. Generally, I read it
into the
computer, edit it, and write it to DVD for distribution to family and
friends. The
original is preserved on tape, but rarely used again. If something happens
to the
edited version, I can always start again with the raw footage.
Howard
<arrayprofile@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1126286922.619031.88970@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Hi, I am about to choose a digtal camcordder between Sony DCR-HC42 vs.
Canon Optura 400. Some of the reviews I read said that sony has a poor
low light performance and canon's one does much better
(camcorderinfo.com), but others said sony usually does better in low
light performance (pcworld.com, interestingly at the same time, some
user's reviews there mentioned poor in low light performance). I also
heard that canon's one had eats tape problem (circuitcity.com). Can
anyone share your opinion? I mainly use camcorder for my baby, so many
indoor activity (both day and night)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PTravel
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 15, 2005 11:24 pm Post subject:
Re: sony vs canyon |
|
|
"Howard Ring" <newsring@nospam.wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
news:tZGdnTh-DLu7pMzeRVn-rA@wideopenwest.com...
| Quote: | I am not much help in choosing between Sony and Canon, I think they both
make good products. I saw that you want to use the camera to preserve
family memories, and that you are concerned about a possible tape eating
problem.
I think all MiniDV cameras eat tapes now and then.
|
I've never had a miniDV camera eat a tape.
| Quote: | The format just isn't
that
durable.
|
It's extremely durable IF you use a quality tape, camcorder with a solid
transport, maintain your camcorder, properly store your tape, and don't
reuse tapes multiple times.
| Quote: | I rarely use my footage for normal playback. Generally, I read it
into the
computer, edit it, and write it to DVD for distribution to family and
friends.
|
I agree, that's the best way to do it. I run tapes through my camera
exactly once -- when I shoot the video. I run the tapes through a second
camera, again exactly once, when I transfer the video to my computer. Then
I store the tape in a cool, dry place. I make a copy of the edited video to
tape (in miniDV DV-25 format) and, of course, can make multiple DVDs when I
want.
| Quote: | The
original is preserved on tape, but rarely used again. If something happens
to the
edited version, I can always start again with the raw footage.
Howard
arrayprofile@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1126286922.619031.88970@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Hi, I am about to choose a digtal camcordder between Sony DCR-HC42 vs.
Canon Optura 400. Some of the reviews I read said that sony has a poor
low light performance and canon's one does much better
(camcorderinfo.com), but others said sony usually does better in low
light performance (pcworld.com, interestingly at the same time, some
user's reviews there mentioned poor in low light performance). I also
heard that canon's one had eats tape problem (circuitcity.com). Can
anyone share your opinion? I mainly use camcorder for my baby, so many
indoor activity (both day and night)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Howard Ring
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 15, 2005 11:57 pm Post subject:
Re: sony vs canyon |
|
|
I think our definition of durable is different. Yes, if you take care, you
probably won't have any problems. But the MiniDV tape clearly won't
take the abuse that a VHS cassette would. If you try to use them for
multiple viewings, especially if you back up to review a section several
times, you are likely to have problems. Don't plan to use MiniDV as the
viewing format. Dump it to some other format, such as DVD, for typical
viewing.
Howard
"PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote in message
news:wPb4f.3977$Zv5.2104@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
| Quote: |
"Howard Ring" <newsring@nospam.wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
news:tZGdnTh-DLu7pMzeRVn-rA@wideopenwest.com...
I am not much help in choosing between Sony and Canon, I think they both
make good products. I saw that you want to use the camera to preserve
family memories, and that you are concerned about a possible tape eating
problem.
I think all MiniDV cameras eat tapes now and then.
I've never had a miniDV camera eat a tape.
The format just isn't
that
durable.
It's extremely durable IF you use a quality tape, camcorder with a solid
transport, maintain your camcorder, properly store your tape, and don't
reuse tapes multiple times.
I rarely use my footage for normal playback. Generally, I read it
into the
computer, edit it, and write it to DVD for distribution to family and
friends.
I agree, that's the best way to do it. I run tapes through my camera
exactly once -- when I shoot the video. I run the tapes through a second
camera, again exactly once, when I transfer the video to my computer.
Then
I store the tape in a cool, dry place. I make a copy of the edited video
to
tape (in miniDV DV-25 format) and, of course, can make multiple DVDs when
I
want.
The
original is preserved on tape, but rarely used again. If something
happens
to the
edited version, I can always start again with the raw footage.
Howard
arrayprofile@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1126286922.619031.88970@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Hi, I am about to choose a digtal camcordder between Sony DCR-HC42 vs.
Canon Optura 400. Some of the reviews I read said that sony has a poor
low light performance and canon's one does much better
(camcorderinfo.com), but others said sony usually does better in low
light performance (pcworld.com, interestingly at the same time, some
user's reviews there mentioned poor in low light performance). I also
heard that canon's one had eats tape problem (circuitcity.com). Can
anyone share your opinion? I mainly use camcorder for my baby, so many
indoor activity (both day and night)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PTravel
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 16, 2005 2:28 am Post subject:
Re: sony vs canyon |
|
|
"Howard Ring" <newsring@nospam.wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
news:apWdnd6z0KBtzczenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
| Quote: | I think our definition of durable is different. Yes, if you take care, you
probably won't have any problems. But the MiniDV tape clearly won't
take the abuse that a VHS cassette would. If you try to use them for
multiple viewings, especially if you back up to review a section several
times, you are likely to have problems. Don't plan to use MiniDV as the
viewing format. Dump it to some other format, such as DVD, for typical
viewing.
|
I agree that miniDV isn't a viewing format, but VHS is. I don't think it's
really fair to compare the two. I simply don't want people thinking that
miniDV is so fragile and unreliable that they go with one of the crappy new
DVD or hard disk camcorders. MiniDV is a perfectly reliable medium,
provided it's used properly and as intended.
| Quote: |
Howard
"PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote in message
news:wPb4f.3977$Zv5.2104@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Howard Ring" <newsring@nospam.wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
news:tZGdnTh-DLu7pMzeRVn-rA@wideopenwest.com...
I am not much help in choosing between Sony and Canon, I think they
both
make good products. I saw that you want to use the camera to preserve
family memories, and that you are concerned about a possible tape
eating
problem.
I think all MiniDV cameras eat tapes now and then.
I've never had a miniDV camera eat a tape.
The format just isn't
that
durable.
It's extremely durable IF you use a quality tape, camcorder with a solid
transport, maintain your camcorder, properly store your tape, and don't
reuse tapes multiple times.
I rarely use my footage for normal playback. Generally, I read it
into the
computer, edit it, and write it to DVD for distribution to family and
friends.
I agree, that's the best way to do it. I run tapes through my camera
exactly once -- when I shoot the video. I run the tapes through a
second
camera, again exactly once, when I transfer the video to my computer.
Then
I store the tape in a cool, dry place. I make a copy of the edited
video
to
tape (in miniDV DV-25 format) and, of course, can make multiple DVDs
when
I
want.
The
original is preserved on tape, but rarely used again. If something
happens
to the
edited version, I can always start again with the raw footage.
Howard
arrayprofile@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1126286922.619031.88970@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Hi, I am about to choose a digtal camcordder between Sony DCR-HC42
vs.
Canon Optura 400. Some of the reviews I read said that sony has a
poor
low light performance and canon's one does much better
(camcorderinfo.com), but others said sony usually does better in low
light performance (pcworld.com, interestingly at the same time, some
user's reviews there mentioned poor in low light performance). I also
heard that canon's one had eats tape problem (circuitcity.com). Can
anyone share your opinion? I mainly use camcorder for my baby, so
many
indoor activity (both day and night)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
w stewart
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:12 am Post subject:
Re: DVD Promos from 50p on Ebay , NOW!! |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|